User talk:TxFactChecker

Username COI
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "MaciasStrategies", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you.

I'm guessing this is the account of the conservative political consulting firm Macias Strategies. SamHolt6 (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)


 * It's worth noting that this complaining user, SamHolt6, tagged Thomas McNutt with a Conflict of Interest tag, even though there was no proven conflict of interest. This user may have chosen his name poorly, and his initial page had some POV problems with it, but it seemed genuine and in researching this politician, he's notable. Flatoncsi (talk) 20:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk) 20:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Thomas McNutt) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Thomas McNutt, TxFactChecker!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"redirected to article he's mentioned in. Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG - maybe WP:TOOSOON"

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jay Wiley


The article Jay Wiley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Subject fails WP:NPOL. The sources I could find were routine coverage from previous failed campaigns. This is an obvious advertisement ahead of the next election by a CoI editor."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 20:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jay Wiley


A tag has been placed on Jay Wiley, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.votejaywiley.com/meet-jay.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dogsix (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brian Byrd


The article Brian Byrd has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable politician."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 21:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

This is a notable politician in Texas. Just because user User:reddogsix is uninformed does not mean this politician is "non-notable".

Proposed deletion of Thomas McNutt


The article Thomas McNutt has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable politician."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

This is a notable politician in Texas. Just because user User:reddogsix is uninformed does not mean this politician is "non-notable".

Nomination of Thomas McNutt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas McNutt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas McNutt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 08:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)