User talk:TyA/Archive 1

Talk
Yeah, well, sometimes I get bored. And then I edit pages to say silly and sometimes vulgar things. It doesn't make me a bad person. I was going to change it back myself later. (So don't put my name in your Death Note, haha) I can get why vandalism is bad, but do we really need a bunch of people obsessively going over every change on every page to check for anything that's 'non-constructive'? Just saying, don't get all lecture-y and mad on me. 97.106.13.162 (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Rho

Sinopec
Noticed that you reverted my edits to Sinopec. I think cydebot is making a mistake here; I've explained my edits in the Sinopec talk page as attempting to fix the article's POV issues (based on its neutrality tag) and bring its format in line with other articles about energy firms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.115.168.245 (talk) 01:55, 13 January 2011 (UTC) WHO CARES ABOUT U — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsenalfc066 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I CARE ABOUT U --AznBurger (talk) 02:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

TW
I notice that you have been using TW to make rollbacks, is it possible that you could subsequently warn the user, so that we can keep track as to if they need to be banned or not. More specifically Charles_Cullen.

This would be greatly appreciated, --Jab843 (talk) 03:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Vandal edit Warnings
You warned Megaman7593 for an edit here but your Warning is missing the article-name. Megaman7593 has done at least 3 vandal-edits today, it would be very helpful to other editors if you would include the article-name in any future Warnings. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 02:23, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Tip
While I understand your intentions, this edit is not really needed unless its an abuse of talk pages, user talk pages have the right to blank their own talk page as it is assumed he acknowledged the warning. The user, however, cannot removed declined unblock request and block messages.-- iGeM  iN  ix  15:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, I just figured that since it was a warning, other editors that might also be warning him may like to see the history of the warnings. ZamorakO o (talk) 20:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes but that is why we have the page history for. :) Regardless the user keeps vandalizing after the warnings, you can just report them.-- iGeM  iN  ix  20:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. :3 ZamorakO o (talk) 20:29, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Request for Rollback
I am about 99% ready to grant you rollback. However, there are just a few indications that you are not fully aware of some of Wikipedia's methods, such as the edit mentioned above in which you told a user not to remove warnings from their own user page. Details like this are very minor in proportion to the good work you are doing, but it is very easy using Huggle to overdo things, and I am a little reluctant to put such a tool in the hands of someone who is still rather unsure. I suggest waiting a while, and then asking again. If you like you can ask me directly on my talk page in a month or so, rather than on Requests for permissions/Rollback, and I will look positively on your request, since I have already reviewed your editing history. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:05, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for your feedback, and I shall read over some of the policies when I get a chance. ZamorakO o (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Place D'Youville
Hello ZamorakO o. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Place D'Youville, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: See, this isn't orphaned, which is among the requirements for G6. Thank you. Courcelles 16:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * But it's a disambig page for 2 pages that do not exist. ZamorakO o (talk) 16:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Correct. But read Template:Db-disambig carefully, it says right at the top that it is a requirement that it be orphaned, which this page is not. The articles will eventually exist, and that's good enough. Courcelles 16:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. ZamorakO o (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

hai
ohaider --AznBurger (talk) 17:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It told me Iiii_I_I_I was too similar to some other guy's username. :( --AznBurger (talk) 17:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hello ZamorakO o, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 13:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I was just coming here to tell you I was about to grant you rollback rights, but I see it's been done. Sorry for the time it has taken to respond: I have had less time available for Wikipedia over the last few days than usually. A word of warning: It is very easy to make mistakes with Huggle, so be careful. Often edits which look at a glance like vandalism have a good reason which is only visible if you look at the editing history of the page, so if there is any doubt at all stop and check. A common example of this is seeing an article blanked: it is important to make sure it isn't the author of the article wanting it deleted before you take action. However, looking at your editing history I am sure you will use the tool responsibly. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for the help with the reverting issues of 68.80.62.254. --Mooshykris (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Did I not thank you?
Your reversion is appreciated! Apparently it went under my radar : ) –  Ker αun oςc op ia◁ galaxies  02:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Anytime. (= ZamorakO o (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Random Thought
Methinks you play Runescape. What level are you? 43?9enter (talk) 01:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Gah, you're so lucky your parents let you be a member. I'm level 87. Meanwhile, what do you think of the climbing boots update? 43?9enter (talk) 02:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it's the main cause of current inflation (I remember when 100k was considered rich) and the Runescape Communist Revolution. (See the Rants forum for more details) But generally it was the PKers who got rich really quickly who actually were affected, and those people who sell climbing boots for money. Do you think Unicows is a good way for money? And also, what do you do for money? 43?9enter (talk) 03:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC) givemefreemembershipplease:P
 * Isn't that pretty slow? And won't you have to replenish your coffers with the money earned? 43?9enter (talk) 03:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll assume maximum efficiency can be achieved via completion of Royal Trouble then. Am I right? 43?9enter (talk) 03:14, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

thanks
For reverting the vandalism to my user page. It is much appreciated. Someone with a Bell IP hates me for reasons I do not know.... Dbrodbeck (talk) 04:16, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about the arbitration form
I'm sorry about the form I really thought it was overlaying what I wrote, I didn't realize I was destroying the content. I would love to not have to go to arbitration by the way but I don't know what else to do. I am trying to add a simple fact to the Big Red Movie page of which I had supporting documentation but he kept removing it. I have tried communicating with him and he just doesn't respond. So if you have any ideas how I can block him from removing valid information please let me know. I would prefer a simpler solution too!! THanks for letting me know I was messing up the form, I am new here. I also just learned about the 3r rule. So can you help me understand why he can continue to revert beyond that limit. just asking, seems he violated that several times today — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandots (talk • contribs) 22:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Helena Bonham Carter is gross. Nothing will change that.
She's so gross. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.50.165 (talk) 03:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Even if you believe that, it cannot be put in articles. ZamorakO o (talk) 03:20, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

For you

 * Thanks, and great job yourself. (= ZamorakO o (talk) 14:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Question
from user: Oliver C M thks for all (talk) the question is; can Case sensitivity be kind of vandalism (?¿) can user: Oliver C M cross out the Case sesitvity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.63.237.142 (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I really don't know what you're talking about. :I ZamorakO o (talk) 19:13, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
Just to let you know - though there is not an SPI open atm - User:Victor Lord Jr. is a sock of the recently blocked User talk:68.97.208.218. Rain the One  BAM 03:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the tip. ZamorakO o (talk) 03:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * One Life to Live miscellaneous characters has also been tampered with again. Rain the One  BAM 03:31, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

HansKeppel
Hi, I accidentally erased the articles for deletion notion before. I added it after I read you comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HansKeppel (talk • contribs) 19:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

The Playbook
I saw you reverted this edit to the music section (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Playbook_%28How_I_Met_Your_Mother%29&action=historysubmit&diff=447583794&oldid=447583682 ) and I was wondering if you read the removed content that you reverted.

It is a Spanish language summary of the episode, and doesn't belong in the English Wikipedia entry at all, much less in the "Music" section of the article, I'm not sure that an explanation was really needed for removing that content. Kelbesque (talk) 16:46, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops, my mistake entirely. I looked at my contributions for that time, and noticed I reverted 2 other edits very quickly after that one, so I must of rushed through that edit to revert some of those others. Once again, sorry about that. ZamorakO o (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Why?
Why are you trying to delete "The Perfect Roommate" page, it's created by me. No Copyright. I did everything myself. Like the Image. That page just needs to be locked to prevent anyone from editing it. Except admins and me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chansep2009 (talk • contribs)
 * The page is up for discussion on whether or not it will be deleted. The discussion is being held here, and you may join in the conversation if you wish. It is against policy to remove an AfD tag from a page until the discussion is closed and the tag is removed by an administrator. ZamorakO o (talk) 03:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * hai Ajraddatz (Talk) 14:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

I created
I swear I created this page. Everything's owned by me. So please don't delete "The Perfect Roommate". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chansep2009 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Om nom nom nom. :) ZamorakO o (talk) 04:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

86.106
Your warning at User talk:86.106.221.218 doesn't seem ideal. Removing the IP's edit was OK, but the edit was not "unverifiable". It was duplicating content already in the article. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. I was reverting it because in the diff it appeared to be them just placing in information, and I wasn't reading the entire article. ^^' ZamorakO o (talk) 20:39, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Feedback Dashboard upgrade
Hi Zamorak0 o,

Thanks for signing up for the Feedback Dashboard response team! I wanted to let you know that the tool just got an important update (see here for details). I also wanted to invite you to the IRC office hours session that Steven and I are going to hold this Sunday, December 4. Hope you can make it and share your experience/questions with us! Thanks again, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:41, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 24 December 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey zammy
It's Hydro here :) --TerryAga (talk) 10:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
For this, best QU TalkQu 23:39, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. I find it somewhat funny how the message he was messing with was the one saying it was going to be reverted. :P ~ty(talk) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, some people don't learn...! QU TalkQu 23:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

RE:Welcome
Ohai der  Liquidbluefire Talk 08:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, damn. Can I substitute one though?  Liquidbluefire Talk 08:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Substitution is allowed, yes. → Σ  τ  c . 00:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Reverting anon edits
Hi, I noticed that you reverted an anon edit which was made with an edit summary of "Too much trivia", and left the editor a message stating that he had not provided an edit summary. You also reinstated the text deleted by the previous edit as well, including WP:PEACOCK "his brilliant career". IMHO the anon edits were in good faith and an improvement. Please review WP:BITE, and be careful how you use those semi-automated tools – maybe your finger slipped, but it's yet another instance that puts me off them! – Fayenatic L (talk) 22:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops! Sorry about that. I've read over the pages, and I hope it won't happen again. ~ty(talk) 02:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiThanks
You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 66.87.2.33 (talk) 23:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Hai
Hey TyA. --PlasmaTime (talk) 22:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * <3 ~ty(talk) 01:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
A kitten should help to make your talk page look nicer eh?

Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 06:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 

The bot was approved for a 50 edit trial
Title says it all. -- Kangaroo  powah  22:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request TyAbot
Someone has marked Bots/Requests for approval/TyAbot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place  anywhere on this page.

Talkback
Hasteur (talk) 23:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

TyABot and Igloo
I noticed you withdrew your bot request for alerting former igloo users about the new igloo, I was just wondering why this was? Also if appropriate (?) I can pick this up and send out notifications. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 17:38, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi!
Hi TyA, it's me Allen! How are you? -- Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 07:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

John Currie Athletic Director Bio
The "controversy" section is one person's opinionated view and irrelevant to John's factual personal bio. It should be removed. WillieWabash27 (talk) 19:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Currie_(athletic_director) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillieWabash27 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Filed WP:AIV against Haxerlololol
Thanks for suffering his vandalism! :) L3X1 (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It was nothing :) ~ty(talk) 21:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Hasty speedy deletion tagging
Please slow down on butt reading pages for speedy deletion. I see two pages you assssed, Lili chranko and Discrete Trial Training and Autism were tagged shortly after creation. Lili chranko was created at 20:47 and you tagged it at 20:47. Discrete Trial Training and Autism was created at 20:43 and you tagged it at 20:44. Both were tagged with A1. If you read the criterion it says "Don't use this tag in the first few minutes after a new article is created." That means you should normally wait at least 10 minutes before tagging an article with WP:A1. The same applies to WP:A3. - GB fan 23:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It is recommended to not use other tags quickly either even though it is not written in the policy. The exceptions to this are tagging attack (WP:G10) and copyright violations (WP:G12). - GB fan 23:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * My apologies, they appeared in Huggle so I tagged them. I guess I shall avoid doing that in the future. ~ty(talk) 23:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Seeing as how as you noticed the requests to message me about them, but not to delete them. Do the pages not fall under any CSD? ~ty(talk) 23:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just because they appear in huggle doesn't mean you have to tag them, you need to make the decision. You need to look at everything including how old the article is and decide if it should be tagged. I am not saying don't tag things, just don't tag them within minutes of creation. Let the creators have some time to work before they are tagged for deletion. Quickly tagging for deletion can drive the editor away. They both do meet the criterion and will probably be deleted because the editors are most likely gone since they never had a chance to work on them before they were told they would be deleted. Who knows they might have been good articles if they hadn't gotten told right away we are going to delete the article. If they didn't meet the csd criterion I would have removed the tags. - GB fan 00:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello TyA! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)