User talk:Ty Hogan

Welcome
Thanks for email. Your account appears to have made no edits apart from the COI declaration, and no page Ty Hogan or Draft Ty Hogan has ever existed. The links in your email don't go to anything that exists. Without the title of the deleted page or the name of the account that created it, I really don't know what you are referring to, and obviously can't help. I've posted general guidance below

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:


 * When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI.

An editor who works directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, is very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If they are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, they are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. They can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If they are being compensated, they must provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block.

Please reply on my talk page, better than email, but note that I'm busy this evening and tomorrow, so you may not get an immediate response Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Ignore the start of this message, I've found the user and the page, and I'll reply in due course Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * At first glance, no inline refs and the sources are your own accounts, hardly independent third-party sources, and lots of external links in the text, more anon Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Your image is a copyright violation from FaceBook and elsewhere under licences that do not confirm that it is free to use for any purpose, including commercial, as claimed by the image uploader. We can only accept images that you have only released ad PD, especially as we can't confirm that the uploader owns the copyright anyway.


 * The text isn't dreadful, apart from the politics section, which is just a promo for his views and claims for what he is supposed to have done, spam links to his companies, and the lack of any verification for what is written on that page.
 * It's not clear on what basis you claim to meet the notability guidelines. Political incumbents may be notable, not necessarily candidates Jimfbleak - <i style="font-family:arial;color:green">talk to me?</i> 15:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)