User talk:Tyangarin

Image source problem with Image:9.11.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:9.11.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. Thank you. 145.97.39.143 00:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:9.11.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:9.11.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Removal of atomic bomb image from Japan
I have to ask having looked through the history page why you keep continually removing the Atomic bomb image from the Japan article despite it being put back in by many different users. You never give any explanation for the edit and keep coming back and removing it again. Continual removal of the image in this fashion could be considered disruptive editing by some users so I ask why you keep removing what is an important part of the history. Ben W Bell  talk  17:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The atomic bombing is an important matter historically. But it is a negative image and tragic affair to Japan. I don't like bad matter.--Tyangarin 06:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, but your personal opinion on the matter isn't relevant to an encyclopaedia. It may be negative on Japan, but it's not unencyclopaedic and is a defining moment in Japan's history. Please stop removing it. Ben W Bell   talk  18:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Daniel Chiswick (talk) 14:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Appletrees (talk) 14:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Inappropriate comments
Comments like this are inappropriate. Do not tell other users not to edit pages because you have a disagreement with them. Also just because you may disagree with someone's edits doesn't make them vandalsm, so be careful about waving the vandalism bandwagon around the place. Ben W Bell  talk  15:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.
 * See Requests for checkuser/Case/Tyangarin -- lucasbfr  ho ho ho 12:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)