User talk:Tygsreow

Awsome page!!

Speedy deletion nomination of Tygsreow Info


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tygsreow Info, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ⁓ Hello  71  18:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tygsreow
Hello, Tygsreow. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tygsreow, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Cgtdk (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I have deleted both these pages. Please read Wikipedia is not for things made up one day, and then find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page. JohnCD (talk) 18:35, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, The number 11


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The number 11. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 11 (number). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 11 (number) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tygsreow


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tygsreow, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sam Sailor (talk) 15:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Tygsreow. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   15:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Tygsreow. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. --   LuK3      (Talk)   15:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC) The 'Tygsreow'article is not vandalism or a hoax.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Tygsreow
...may be "a real word", but it has no place in Wikipedia. For the reasons, see Wikipedia is not for things made up one day and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. JohnCD (talk) 18:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)