User talk:Tyhenry64

March 2016
Hello, I'm Stephenb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Croxden has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Stephenb (Talk) 14:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Croxden Abbey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 14:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Croxden Abbey. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stephenb (Talk) 14:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Croxden. Stephenb (Talk) 14:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —S MALL JIM   14:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)