User talk:Tyler3221996

Welcome!
Hello, Tyler3221996, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Boudewijn Revis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Comatmebro (talk) 20:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Boudewijn Revis


The article Boudewijn Revis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro (talk) 20:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
― Tartan357  Talk 03:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Kate R. Cook
Hello @Tyler3221996. I am @Archer1234. I have noticed your edits at Kate R. Cook. Thanks for your edits there. It is a good start for an article. I observed a couple of times that you have reinserted a line break in the infobox. It is not widely known, but per Wikipedia's Manual of Style and for accessibility reasons we should not use link breaks (see MOS:NOBR for more information). I had replaced the line break using the Ubl (unbulleted list) template, which visually achieves the same effect as using a line break. So there is no reason to use a line break there. I would appreciate it if you would remove the line break or, if you'd like, I can take care of it. Let me know. If you see any other edits of mine that you do not understand or have questions about, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help at the Teahouse. Good luck. &mdash; Archer1234 (talk) 04:00, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Kate R. Cook while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Archer1234 (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

About your edit summaries
Hello @Tyler3221996. Many of your recent edits have an identical edit summary of Added relevant information citing reliable online news sources. That vague summary is no better than no edit summary at all. In What to avoid in edit summaries, WP:SUMMARYNO says:

Note that an edit summary is designed for these purposes (from Help:Edit summary):

In the future, please provide more information in your edit summaries that specifically describes the specific edit. See WP:EDITSUMCITE for guidance on how to write an edit summary. Thank you. &mdash; Archer1234 (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)