User talk:TylerGildore

May 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Campylobacter showae. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 01:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear @UtherSRG,
 * I apologize, this is my first time contributing to wikipedia and I did not agree with the critiques in the maintenance template so that is why it was removed. I believe the article I wrote was of high quality and that the use of technical language was warranted, given the nature of my article. Additionally, I tried my best to provide explanations for technical jargon within their respective sentences to aid readers (ex. "...testing for oxidase activity to detect the presence of cytochrome c oxidase, an enzyme involved in aerobic respiration..."), and where this was not possible, I used the hyperlink feature to link to other articles with more information. For these reasons, I was wondering if there was any explanation attached to the maintenance template which was added to my article so I can further understand what parts of my article need attention. Additionally, for next time, what procedure should I follow to dispute the maintenance template added to my article so I do not make this mistake again? I apologize for removing the template and I hope we can resolve the problems in this article.
 * Best,
 * Tyler Gildore TylerGildore (talk) 03:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You should ask on the talk page of the article; it exists to discuss changes to the article. Most of the article is full of very jargony terms and much of the information presented is too detailed. This makes it difficult for the typical reader, even with the given explanations. - UtherSRG (talk) 09:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)