User talk:TylerJWolf

Welcome!
Hi TylerJWolf! I noticed your contributions to List of longest living dogs&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Throast  { { ping }} me! (talk &#124; contribs) 22:09, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Throast! Very cool. Thanks for the link, I'll definitely check it out!
 * My first time helping Wikipedia. Looks like your update went through before mine (i think mine is still pending approval or something)...
 * Wondering if it's possible to put a picture of Gino up on the site? I have one I can upload or send you to upload... when I tried, it said it wasn't verified. Not sure, still learning!
 * Thanks!
 * TJW TylerJWolf (talk) 23:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of longest living dogs, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Throast  { { ping }} me! (talk &#124; contribs) 17:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Throast!
 * Thanks for the feedback.
 * The new "record holder" Spike has no verification, while all of the other record holders have had verified birthdates. GWR is working on this and it is very much up for debate.
 * Also, for some reason Gino was completely removed from the list of the oldest living dogs, while he should definitely be included in that table, whether or not he is the current oldest living dog.
 * Thanks!
 * T TylerJWolf (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @TylerJWolf Wikipedia is not a place for original research (WP:OR) - there is a source listed for Spike making note of the record. You need another reliable source (Verifiability) if you are claiming it is wrong. Meszzy2  (talk) 17:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Meszzy,
 * I added Gino back to the table of longest living dogs.
 * As for the "controversy" section, I will get approval from GWR to publish that.
 * Thanks,
 * Tyler TylerJWolf (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @TylerJWolf I would strongly recommend reading No original research - Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. Meszzy2  (talk) 18:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of longest living dogs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meszzy2 (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to List of longest living dogs has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Sundayclose (talk) 03:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi @TylerJWolf - thanks for helping keep Wikipedia aligned with our core content policies by making citations. These policies help in our mission of being the largest free online encyclopedia. Meszzy2 (talk) 18:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I second this comment. :) Throast  { { ping }} me! (talk &#124; contribs) 19:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * My photograph was taken down. Flagged as potential copyright infringement. The photo is mine. What should I do? TylerJWolf (talk) 20:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You don't own the photo. It was located on a website with a copyright notice (https://www.today.com/pets/gino-worlds-oldest-dog-living-guinness-rcna58181). Copying a photo from a website doesn't entitle you to claim ownership and put it on Wikipedia. If you want to claim that you own it, you need to provide evidence. The photo was deleted from Wikipedia for copyright violation. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 22:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * We DO own the photo. We took the photo.
 * That photograph was USED by today.com because we sent it to them for their coverage of this story, but they don't own it.
 * What proof would you need/would we have to show that we own it? TylerJWolf (talk) 23:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Click the link I gave you and look at the photo that you copied. Eliot Brusman is the owner of the photo. Here is where it was deleted for copyright violation. If you, in fact, did grant today.com the rights to use the photo, you need to take that up with the people at today.com and tell them to grant Wikipedia permission to use the photo. Wikipedia can only go by the copyright notice at today.com, not by your claim without evidence. If you gave up your rights to today.com, there's nothing Wikipedia can do about that. That's between you and today.com. Sundayclose (talk) 23:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * We hired Eliot to take this photo.
 * Whatever, easier to just use a different photo. TylerJWolf (talk) 23:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)