User talk:TylerPal

Welcome!
Hello, TylerPal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  02:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Hall Pass does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''Your removal of duplicate wikilinks is most welcome, but we need edit summaries, especially at 'Recent changes' where it helps weed out constructive editing from vandals, and saves us time having to check why you've removed them. Thanks'' Nick Moyes (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello TylerPal, you have been asked to use edit summaries, but you are still not using them. These help other editors to see why you have made changes. Can you start using them? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Despite being asked multiple times you are continuing to just edit and remove information without edit summaries. Your edits appear to be mostly just removing information in parentheses without any rhyme or reason. People begin to add constructive edits. -  Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk  22:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Oknazevad. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The CW have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. oknazevad (talk) 00:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. 'Indiscriminate and unexplained removal of legitimate information within parenthesis is highly disruptive. Please stop.' Ad Orientem (talk) 22:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello TylerPal. Not all content in parentheses should be deleted. If you must, consider moving it outside parens or removing it on some other justification (e.g. unsourced), but this looks like indiscriminate removal. Either discuss your changes or stop these edits. SnowFire (talk) 00:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The WB, you may be blocked from editing. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Romo. ''Almost all of your edits that I have looked at so far are disruptive. That plus the fact that you have not responded to numerous messages and warnings causes me to suspect that this is deliberate vandalism. You are very close to being indefinitely blocked.'' Ad Orientem (talk) 00:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. SnowFire (talk) 06:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)