User talk:Tylercomm

Hello, Tylercomm, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.-- VViking Talk Edits 14:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello Tylercomm. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tylercomm. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -- VViking Talk Edits 20:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. VViking Talk Edits 14:12, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

I have updated my profile. I work for Tyler. Viewmont Viking's edits are the disruptive edits that should be stopped. I am adding notable alumni by request of the dean and linking legitimate sources and they keep getting removed. Please let me know how we can prevent sourced edits from being deleted. I am not adding promotional material, but undoing VV's edits, which remove cited information. If promotional material needs to be altered to meet the guidelines, please do so but make any cited changes as separate edits. Or, please explain why these legitimate citations are being removed. Thank you. Tylercomm (talk) 14:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Tylercom