User talk:Tylerhoehne

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Tikiwont (talk) 11:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Talk:Thom Wolf
Usernow (talk) 19:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It's very difficult to understand what is going on with this page. Many months ago this page was unorganized, badly written, badly linked with no verifiablity.  Over the past several months there has appeared a much better written, seemingly accurate, reasonable contribution.  In the last week this contribution has been blasted away and again replaced with a poor contribution, leading to a "Speedy deletion" notice. Confusing matter more, it has been split into two pages.
 * Disambiguation may not make sense as it is obvious from the various links that both "Thom Wolf (pastor)" and "Thom Wolf (educator)" are the same person.
 * For now I will undo all these changes and request another editor to provide feedback.

Speedy deletion of Talk:Thom Wolf
A tag has been placed on Talk:Thom Wolf, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. OsamaK 09:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I've deleted above talk page to remove your overt contact info from the history. You can simply make you point there and been contacted via this page and contact others on their talk pages. If you want you can enable e-mail feature via your preferences. See above for some more useful links. Also, note that an article on Thom Wolf had been deleted in the past and please take a look at wikipedia's conflict of interest, and notability guidelines.--Tikiwont (talk) 11:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You seem to have overlooked the fact that there was an article about a different person know as Thom Wolf. That has already caused confusion in the past. I've fixed it now.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually I seem to have been mistaken here as I just noticed that you replaced an article about a baptist pastor with a resume of someone who didn't seem to have been a Baptist preacher in his past. Let me also clarify that above speedy deletion notice was only for the talk page, whih has been recreated and where we can discuss this further. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:02, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

What has happened is that there are two people being discussed. Tom Wolf is the person described right now in the Thom Wolf article. I am a personal friend of Thom and the information that is up is compromising to his current work place. The information that I put up for Thom Wolf is his current occupation and current Information. The information that is up now is okay but needs to be put under Tom Wolf.Tylerhoehne (talk) 01:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)