User talk:Tylerjamesmax

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 22:28, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 23:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

In addition to unsupported peacock words, your revisions also violate several other style guides about articles. Please read the core policies and style guides again. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 00:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Now check out the Manual of style and it's subsidiary pages. Unfortunately, your version fails from the very first sentence. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 01:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Do not copy the organization's web page into Wikipedia. - sinneed (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Communications Director
Conflict of Interest ==

On my talk page, you wrote

hello sineed i am the person trying to update the sweet relief page. i am the communications director for the charity and I am using copy from various press and info pieces i have written. the only copy/paste i used was the supporter list. you folks are amazing at this wiki stuff. i am trying. i would really like to see some of the info i entered back on. your last edit looked good. what do you think? tylerjamesmax —Preceding unsigned comment added by [index.php?title=User:Tylerjamesmax&action=edit&redlink=1 Tylerjamesmax] (talk • contribs) 01:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

It is generally much much better if people who are interested but not involved do the article-writing. wp:conflict of interest is good reading in this case.

Your statement about the copying was not correct, as the bulk of the article was exactly what I found when I followed the link to the organization's web site. The site is clearly marked "copyright". Thus, you must not, no matter who you are, copy it into Wikipedia.

- sinneed (talk) 01:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sweet Relief Fund has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/sweetreliefmusiciansfund). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You really should stop now. It really is a copy. If you do not, you will most certainly be blocked.- sinneed (talk)

On my talk page, you wrote: ok I give up. I was only trying to get good up to date info about our charity in Wiki. Maybe you could write it for us? I am amazed at how you and the other person who wrote and edited were so quick and consistent. Who are you folks? How does wiki cover so well with almost 3 million entries. I am impressed and appreciate you all keeping wiki on the up and up. Maybe you can recommend a wiki writer for us. We are a charity and have no funds for this kind of thing oh well peace Rob Max [index.php?title=User:Tylerjamesmax&action=edit&redlink=1 Tylerjamesmax] (talk) 02:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

There are, I think, about 10,000 people scattered around the world who use various tools to watch for edits that should not be there. There may be more or less. But there are a lot.- sinneed (talk) 02:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bfacebook\.com (links: http://apps.facebook.com/causes/119362/38588828?m=95ac708a&ref=nf). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added  do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the  before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Sweet Relief Fund
You have again attempted to paste in much text that is a direct copy of the content from here

For example: "Sweet Relief Musicians Fund provides financial assistance to all types of career musicians who are struggling to make ends meet while facing illness, disability, or age-related problems"

Is under "mission" on the website.

The text you are attempting to add includes a section "Charity Mission"

"Sweet Relief Musicians Fund provides assistance to all types of career musicians who are struggling to make ends meet while facing illness, disability, or age-related problems."

If this were the only content you were copying (even without the "financial"), you could possibly comply with wp:Quote. But it is not. You must stop at once.- sinneed (talk) 23:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)