User talk:Tym2412

Edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Yamla (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

With all due respect, I hope you sent the exact same message to the other editors in this "edit war". Tym2412 (talk) 13:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

BRD cycle
You made a bold edit. It was reverted. Then you discuss. See WP:BRD -- Green  C  13:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I wasn't discussing anything. I made an edit that I think is best for the page. Period.


 * I don't know what you mean by "period" .. Wikipedia is a co-operative project where we work together. There are no dictators, overlords or kings for example. If there is a disagreement between editors the rules say we discuss it on the article talk page and reach a "consensus". If you can convince others your picture is better then please do so, I and others will listen to your case. --  Green  C  18:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Your recent editing history at Ilhan Omar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.


 * I didn't even start it. Please remove this message from my talk page. Thank you. Tym2412 (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Christie Murphy BB21.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Christie Murphy BB21.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Christie Murphy Big Brother 21.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Christie Murphy Big Brother 21.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Christie Murphy BB21.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Christie Murphy BB21.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Christie Murphy Big Brother 21.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Christie Murphy Big Brother 21.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samuel Sloan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Your recent editing history at Peyton List (actress, born 1998) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Template:Socialism USA


Hello, Tym2412. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:Socialism USA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Image warring at Caitlyn Jenner
In this edit at Caitlyn Jenner, you altered long-standing consensus for the infobox image of Caitlyn Jenner to another image, without comment in the edit summary. This was reverted here with this summary: "Undid good faith revision 980719173 by Tym2412 (talk) Horrible picture. It is more recent, however, and if you think that trumps pic quality, maybe start a discussion on the Talk page and see if there's a consensus. Or, just find a recent one that's better." You reverted back in this edit on 29 October 2020, resinserting your preferred image only four days after being warned by an admin at the 3RR board about edit warring. You are not at 3RR with that revert, but Wikipedia policy calls for discussion and consensus to resolve content disputes, not edit warring. If you attempt to change an article, and are reverted, that is a sign that you should go to the Talk page, and make the case for your preferred version. What one should avoid, is reverting again with a simple, "No, this one is better." See WP:BRD. Even though you are not at 3RR here, given your pattern of disruptive editing, edit warring, and the high percentage of your edits that are reverted by other editors for cause, I think you are skating on thin ice. Please follow all Wikipedia guidelines on editing, including WP:BRD, WP:3RR, and other relevant policies. Best regards, Mathglot (talk) 08:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I did not edit war, so get your facts straight. Thank you!

President elect in info boxes
Tyn2412, there appears to be a strong consensus here [] that info boxes should not include president-elect positions in cases where the person is currently in that position with the current administration. This doesn't apply if the person will be new to that position with the new administration. Springee (talk) 16:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not the one who put that there, someone else put those positions. Tym2412 (talk) 16:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Lara Trump
Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard 2601:601:CE80:8640:5DE0:FEFE:7BF7:4B8A (talk) 08:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Editor raised an issue at ANI affecting you
While you haven't been named, as far as I can tell, the IP editor above has raised a topic primarily concerning an edit you made. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Help on Wikiproject Climate change project
Hi,

any chance you want to help out on increasing coverage and info on this ? Carbon sink upscaling additional info on carbon sink upscaling (missing info) --Genetics4good (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

James Charles
Please as I know you changed frequently James Charles page but I think that his photo could be a more recent one (the Vogue Photo) I recently added in Wikipedia Commons so then i could change but I think that only you can Wylmermonteiro (talk) 00:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Template:Tymsocialism
Hello, Tym2412. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:Tymsocialism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Template:Tymsocialism


Hello, Tym2412. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:Tymsocialism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Floribama Shore.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Floribama Shore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Tym2412! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 16:38, Thursday, April 7, 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Latto, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — VersaceSpace  🌃 22:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Thedarkknightli. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Nicki Minaj, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Thedarkknightli (talk) 01:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023: Please update access-dates when updating chart positions
Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Feather (song), concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the access-date parameter in the citation template. The access-date parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ss  112   08:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)