User talk:TypeBoots

Here are the diffs for above. I don't know why, but I couldn't include them in the unblock request. & TypeBoots (talk) 05:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Seriously, you came in right after the last sock was blocked, started advocating the same things, with the same wording and even repeating your habit of starting a new section for each comment you make. I have very little doubt that you have created multiple accounts for use on the article and keep starting a new one each time you are blocked.  Please stop.  Shell    babelfish 06:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Then I want a CheckUser run to prove that you are wrong. I didn't do anything wrong. The admin. MastCell asked me to log in and this is what happens, totally unfair. Obviously he admin just wanted me to log in so I could be banned. TypeBoots (talk) 07:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Uhhuh - been here one day and know what a checkuser is. That's really not going to help your case.  And no, I'm seriously considering having your IP range rooted out so it won't matter if you log in or not - again, please stop.   Shell    babelfish 07:14, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Go ahead. Last time I was aware knowing how Wikipedia worked wasn't a crime. TypeBoots (talk) 07:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment: as Shell was the blocking admin, it would probably be helpful if neutral and uninvolved admins also review this situation. — Athaenara ✉  07:40, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Uhm, that's why I didn't remove the block note ;) - anyone is welcome to review it and contact me if they have any questions about the sock problem on the article or the Arb case surrounding it. Shell    babelfish 08:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

The fat lady sings
Requests for checkuser/Case/Uponleft. MastCell Talk 19:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm down, but not out. See you guys soon. TypeBoots (talk) 04:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)