User talk:Typeprint

Notices
I want to emphasize the part about, you have done nothing wrong. As a new editor jumping into some political topics you should be aware of some of these special rules. Springee (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

RFC on the Reagan page
You have added a RFC to the Reagan talk page.....but there is already a on-going RFC on this subject. I think you need to self-revert.Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If so, I was misled by "But this nebulous criteria on length may take something like a RFC to resolve.Rja13ww33 (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2020 (UTC)" Typeprint (talk) 17:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You need to revert. We will hash out the details when the RFC is settled.Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and did it.Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

No consensus for your reversions
The discussion at ANI and talk does not support your reversions at Khive. I suggest you stop. - CorbieVreccan  ☊ ☼ 17:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

None of what you did was a "compromise" and what you are adding back was not stable content. It was recently added and was a BLP vio from the start. Stop revert-warring. - CorbieVreccan  ☊ ☼ 18:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)