User talk:Typewolf

February 2014
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Jerry Rubin does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)  Escape Orbit  (Talk) 22:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference errors on 6 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Werner Erhard page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=684415135 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F684415135%7CWerner Erhard%5D%5D Ask for help])

Edits to Werner Erhard
Thank you for your recent edits to the Werner Erhard article. You have a lot of good things to add and I appreciate your contributions. However, recently you removed a line from the Critics and Disputes section and moved it to the Impact section. I don't think this line belongs in that section, as it really says nothing about the Impact that his work has had, it is more about what other people have said about him. I went ahead and put back in the old entry. Thanks --MLKLewis (talk) 00:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Noticed your excellent edits on the Jack Canfield Article!
Hey Typewolf! My name is Jonathan and back then I tried to several times add, omit and improve the article about Jack Canfield. I loved seeing your recent edits! Would love if you could check out my proposed version I did back in the day, and see if you think you can use any information? I feel like the article is still doing a disservice to the man, who I think deserves more credit. I've read most of his books and admire him, really. Check it out here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Psychology_Forever/Jack_Canfield Thank you any way! Much love! Jonathan Psychology Forever (talk) 14:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)