User talk:Typhoon2013/Archive8

This is the 8th Archive of Typhoon2013's talk page. Archive 8 includes events during 2020.

Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are, , and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
 * Royal standard of England (1406–1603).svg Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
 * 🇺🇸 Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
 * Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
 * Pirate Flag.svg CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
 * The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included 🇺🇸 L293D, 🇻🇪 Kingsif, 🇦🇶 Enwebb, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski and 🇳🇵 CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup newsletter correction
There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; 🇺🇸 L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, 🇺🇸 Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Typhoon Phanfone
Hello, Typhoon2013,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Typhoon Phanfone for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 21:14, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

webcitation.org
FYI: I believe you are the editor adding these? It's creating link rot in many articles. Use the original URL in the url field as designed, or it creates link rot. Archive providers stop working - we can move it to a different archive provider, but it we don't know the original/source url then it's a goner. - Green  C  14:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I would be very surprised if Typhoon2013 was responsible for the addition of the links you mention - bearing in mind that he has only edited the article in question 7 times and that the 2013 in his name is deliberate.Jason Rees (talk) 00:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You are correct my apologies. It was added by the article creator. -- Green  C  00:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Typhoon Committee
FYI the Typhoon Committee meeting was cancelled this year, as a result we can not out any names down as retired yet.Jason Rees (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yep I was already aware. I thought they would be delaying the meeting until the end of May, though? From the last page of this. -- Typhoon2013 01:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Well lets wait and see how things play out as its likely going to be postponed again if things continue as they are! However, if you were already aware that the meeting was cancelled, why did you re-add the retired names the other day? Jason Rees (talk) 23:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I do not recall re-adding the retired names "the other day". However would this count? -- Typhoon2013 01:08, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * No it doesnt count as it is just a DRAFT as a result until the committee meets we can not add them in.Jason Rees (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Proof
Do you have any proof of this? I feel like I've ran into a similar problem before. YE Pacific Hurricane 21:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * As per my edit in the 1992 PTS, Gary turned out to be "Ditang". No other TCs formed between Gary and Janis with the exception of Irving that was within the PAR. I have emailed PAGASA recently once again to provide a source of confirmed PAGASA storms from 1989 through to 1996. My source that I have used to confirm about Gary is in the 1992 talk page. -- Typhoon2013 01:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

The 40th Edition of The Hurricane Herald
WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 40

WikiCup 2020 May newsletter
The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
 * Royal standard of England (1406–1603).svg Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
 * 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
 * Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski with 869 points, Blason Gondor.svg Hog Farm with 801, 🇻🇪 Kingsif with 719, SounderBruce with 710, 🇺🇸 Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and 🇲🇽 MX with 515.

The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Re: Checkup
Hey there Typhoon2013! I'm doing OK - I've been busy in RL working (I'm lucky I still have a job!) and just trying to manage my sanity in general. I'm working on a few projects on Wikipedia, including trying to maintain 2005 AHS as FA, an active FAC for Effects of Hurricane Wilma in Mexico, and eventually getting Hurricane Wilma to FA. I'll probably be editing more as of next week, when one of my jobs finishes up (I teach music at a community college).

As for your question of getting an article to GA, there are a lot of things to do, but it's a few basic elements.
 * 1) Is it comprehensive? Will a quick Google search reveal information that isn't in the article?
 * 2) Are the sources reliable? Are you mostly using blogs or original research?
 * 3) Is all of the content sourced? Do the citations use Template:Cite web, with proper entries for all of the related fields?
 * 4) Is everything spelled right and the grammar makes sense?

If the answer to all of them is yes, then the article should pass a GA nomination pretty easily. That can be more difficult for costlier/deadlier storms, or for older storms. That's why most new users start with low-impact storms, or List articles. So, with all of that, do you have an article that you're eyeing toward improving? ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * On a side not too, wow I really forgot you did music too! I am on to music too, and currently doing a music theory lecture in university. -- Typhoon2013  01:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah nice! Nothing like music theory to understand why songs work the way they do. As for your failed GAN's, it looks like the articles were pretty good. Tropical Storm Haikui (2017) looks the most incomplete of the three of them, as the MH is incomplete. It looks like the GA reviews identified what you can do for the articles, you just needed more time to finish them? Is that it? If that's the case, you should go back to the articles and clean them up, because they look pretty good :) ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Yep! I am more into composition, though, but music theory was the only available one for my timetable :( . And also yes, my plan is to work in those articles if I also have the same (but they will be my priority!) as I currently have loads of work in uni atm. Definitely will do it before tropical activity flares up again for sure. But yea I really want to complete those articles because I have been here editing for years without having a GA article. -- Typhoon2013  23:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Tropical status of Ex-Mangga
The BOM has not provided any official product to say that the system has dissipated or transitioned into an extratropical low, and until that occurs, we cannot say that it has happened. Weakening below tropical cyclone status does not imply dissipation. By that logic, you could not even say the system has formed until it becomes a Category 1 tropical cyclone. Clearly that is not the case. In any case, the system is (as of 10:38 UTC on 23 May) still referred to as a tropical system in no fewer than 27 locations on the BOM website, and I only looked for five minutes. ChocolateTrain (talk) 10:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Since I do recall you being someone who looks more into the BoM website more so often than anyone else here then sure. I just would like to see what sources from the BoM state that if I may ask. In fact, we actually had a similar discussion regarding this with JR in May last year regarding Lorna, and as per JR, it is unclear from the BoM whether "weakening below TC status" could either mean a TL or an EXTC. For this moment I will accept your revert and my apologies, but of course, we will have to wait for the BT for the BoM's decision. -- Typhoon2013 11:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Usman
Thank you for creating Usman. Did you see the topic on the project talk page? Noah Talk 12:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh no worries I got bored so I made it haha, and I did remember saying that this article was a HUGE must! And surprisingly I just saw the project talk page just now and wow. Well I mean feel free to tweak it a bit or something, this was a bit rushed I guess, but the prose needs working on for sure. -- Typhoon2013 12:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * if you would like to help with the topic, we still need a lot of work done in WPAC. Noah Talk 12:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the two articles you have done thus far. Would you be able to help with getting a majority of the smaller storms up to C class as well? You don't need to do the large storms as they will require a group effort to complete. Noah Talk 21:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Yep sure. The next two weeks for me however is pretty busy for me so I might have to reduce my edits. However this will be my main priorities now on the smaller storm articles. I will try my best to raise as many of these articles to higher standard this year. :) -- Typhoon2013 23:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 19:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Happy birthday!
Good afternoon, my name is Rebestalic

I happen to be a fellow New Zealander and hail from a city that's better than yours a more populous city up north. I was curious to know who updated the New Zealand statistics for COVID-19 today, and there you were

Now, to the point--I was immediately drawn by a rather large picture of a hurricane on your userpage. One of your superimposed userboxes shows that you have recently turned eighteen. So, yes, happy birthday fellow New Zealander

Rebestalic [leave a message....]  02:12, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * sorry for the late reply, but thank you so much! I see you're from New Zealand too though hehe. :) -- Typhoon2013 01:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

41st edition of The Hurricane Herald
WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 41

WikiCup 2020 July newsletter
The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
 * 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man, with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
 * Royal standard of England (1406–1603).svg Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.

Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, 🇩🇰 MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017)
The article Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 00:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your 2018 articles
Hey, I was just wondering if you had considered GANing any of your 2018 articles? I am hoping we can get a GT done before KN has to leave in January (for an extensive time period). Noah Talk 23:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi. Yea sorry for the reduced work, study has really been the priority hence why my edits are really just the updating of the WPac storms :( Very fortunately though, I am in a mid tri break right now, so I could re-look at my 2018 articles. However if you are specifically looking at an actual 2018 storm, then the closest article for me to do a GAN is Usman. :) Where is Keane going on January? Haven't been active on discord lol omg so sorry I'll really owe it up to you. -- Typhoon2013 10:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * And yeah I'll look at Usman for the time being. I just need to relook at sources and find any missing information. I don't want it to become another Nanmadol where it took 2 GANs and took a while haha. -- Typhoon2013 10:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Depression Usman
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tropical Depression Usman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 01:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were


 * Free Hong Kong flag.svg Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
 * 🇮🇩HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

42nd edition of The Hurricane Herald!
WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 42

Usman
I hope you aren't discouraged on Usman.... It will require some work and I may be too strict on reviewing as I try to go to FA a lot nowadays, but I just want to help you improve your writing and research. Noah Talk 17:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Depression Usman
The article Tropical Depression Usman you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tropical Depression Usman for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 11:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

43rd edition of The Hurricane Herald
WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 43

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is, the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by. In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were, , and. The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.


 * wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
 * win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
 * wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
 * wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
 * wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
 * wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
 * wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Tropical Low 01U
Hi there! I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to let you know why I think it's best that we write "Tropical Low 01U" rather than just "01U" in the strongest storm section of the main infobox. The layman—for whom the article is primarily written—is not going to know what 01U means without any context. There's no way of knowing whether it's a tropical cyclone or a tropical low or something else unless you're familiar with the BOM's conventions or Wikipedia's conventions, neither of which can be assumed of the average reader. Listing the system as "Tropical Low 01U" makes it clear to the reader exactly what the system is, rather than just giving an identifier code which doesn't mean anything to most people. This isn't an issue when the strongest system is a named tropical cyclone, because most people will be able to infer that the strongest storm being, for example, "Yasi", means a tropical cyclone called Yasi. We wouldn't need to write Tropical Cyclone Yasi in such an instance, because it's obvious. Just thought I'd clear up my reasoning here. ChocolateTrain (talk) 09:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * On a side note: TCWC Perth, Darwin and Brisbane are gone instead the BoM is operating as 1 TCWC.Jason Rees (talk) 14:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I actually don't think it is a problem to have Tropical Low or not. The windspeed is given alongside the 'name' of that low so people know how strong it became. Besides, this is a puny low that pretty much affected nothing and the public at large had no idea the low existed.--CyclonicallyDeranged (talk) 19:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hope you are doing well too! Yeah you have made a good point and I do agree. Honestly as per what has mentioned I do not mind on adding it or not, besides this is for sure going to be temporary as we got stronger named storms soon. --  Typhoon2013  04:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Tropical low identifiers in the Australian region
Hi again! I saw that you removed the Coral Sea subtropical low from the 2020–21 Australian region cyclone season article because it's been confirmed that the next tropical low will receive the designation 02U and not 03U. This reasoning would make sense normally (in the Atlantic basin, for example), but it doesn't hold up in the Australian region. The BOM only issues xxU identifier codes to tropical lows which they consider to have at least a moderate chance of developing into a named tropical cyclone within the following seven days. Hence, weak tropical—or in this instance, subtropical—lows which are still officially tracked and advised upon do not receive designations. Therefore, we can't discount systems in the Australian basin on the basis that they didn't receive an xxU identifier code. Just thought I would clear this up! ChocolateTrain (talk) 12:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, hi. You are right as well but please refer to this where Hink has gave his opinion about this system. It is not even a TL and it is very uncommon to find a subtropical low. -- Typhoon2013  12:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Typhoon category

 * You want to put this scale in the article of Strong Typhoon ? Dam222 🌋 (talk) 19:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! I would not mind it. At least perhaps just edit the template from Typhoon to Strong typhoon. The colours are not bad really. -- Typhoon2013  01:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Typhoon2013: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, 𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message 𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi and thank you so much! I hope you have a good holidays too! :) -- Typhoon2013  01:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays :)
--CyclonicallyDeranged (talk) 07:58, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


 * ! I hope you have a Merry Christmas and a good holidays to you too! It was nice working with you in areas this year and I am looking forward to working with you in the new year! :) -- Typhoon2013  12:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!




 Typhoon2013 , Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! ~ Destroyer 🌀🌀 18:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)


 * – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
 * Thanks!! And you too as well! :) -- Typhoon2013  11:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)