User talk:Tyree999

Welcome!
Hello, Tyree999, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220  of  Borg 16:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of List of childless people


A tag has been placed on List of childless people, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of people who never married


The article List of people who never married has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * This list will be infinite, and has similar problem to List of childless people

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cahk (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of people who never married for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people who never married is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of people who never married until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cahk (talk) 23:10, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Goldie Hawn. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  20:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Never married listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Never married. Since you had some involvement with the Never married redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  21:10, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of reasons for never getting married


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of reasons for never getting married requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:32, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 07:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of sterilized people. Adam9007 (talk) 01:10, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Liberal eugenics, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:07, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, it's quite obvious that this is you editing while logged out. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:07, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Please avoid using abusive edit summaries as per Civility and No personal attacks. Thanks and happy editing. ( Hohum  @ ) 18:45, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CRISPR other applications


A tag has been placed on CRISPR other applications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRISPR. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you wish to split an article you must provide the appropriate attribution, otherwidse it is a copyright violation. Better to discuss in advance. See WP:Splitting. David Biddulph (talk) 16:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * from WP:Splitting - "For uncontroversial splits, no permission is needed to split; just do it." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.33.24 (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * You've read that sentence in WP:Splitting. Now read the rest of the page, including WP:PROSPLIT and WP:PROPERSPLIT. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for continued agenda-driven original research (sometimes sockpuppetry using an IP address to do so). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ian.thomson (talk) 07:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Birth tax for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birth tax is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Birth tax until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 18:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Block reset and extended
Because you have engaged in block evasion using this IP address, I've reset and extended your block. The block is on you as a person, not this account.
 * Oh, and I see that you were also using 208.54.64.129 and created a second account. I've made the block indefinite.  If you want any of your edits to ever stay on this site, you will need to appeal the block here, promising to never engage in sockpuppetry or original research again. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * As a note, your discussion and suggestions are still useful and valuable. I recommend applying to be unblocked, indicating that you'll endevour to be more careful to follow the rules. Many users who are blocked in their early days of editing go on to make valuable contributions to the encyclopedia. To be clear though, you need to refrain from anonymous editing as a way of evading your existing block until it is resolved. Doing things 'by the book' will save you effort in the long run.
 * To make an unblock request, copy the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: . If you find that you cannot edit your talk page, fill out the form at the Unblock Ticket Request System. (More info at this page). T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 01:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fresh breath
Hello Tyree999,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fresh breath for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. m8e39 01:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)