User talk:Tyrogthekreeper

Welcome!
 Burningview   ✉  15:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Adding names of exoplanets to planetbox along with other changes and additions
When you add names of exoplanets in intro section, you should also add names of exoplanets to planetbox under other designations with ref tag. In addition to this, you should also change mass to minimum_mass in planetbox and remove > before mass value, but not for articles about transiting planets or others with known inclinations. And you should add apparent magnitude of stars in planetbox star if apparent magnitude is not there yet. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 22:31, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Images
Perhaps you could categorize your images into the standard hierarchy?

Your planet images should categorize into Category:planetary images ; if the image also contains a star it should also categorize into Category:Star images ; if it only contains a star it should go into the second category mentioned earlier but not the first.

70.29.209.121 (talk) 06:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Wladimir Lyra
Hello, are you Wladimir Lyra? If you are Wladimir Lyra, don't you suggest names for 30 Arietis Bb, QS Virginis b, Gamma1 Leonis b, both planets around HD 215497, HD 205739 b, and BD+14°4559 b. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 22:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Celestia images
When you insert your Celestia images into an exoplanet article please state them as an artists's impression and not as Orig Research. -- Kheider (talk) 18:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There's a relevant discussion on the planetbox template's talk page. (Also, I've gone through some of the recent additions and added an indication in the captions that they are "artist's impressions".) — Aldaron • T/C 18:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Planet WASP-18 b.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Planet WASP-18 b.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Planet HD 17156 b.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Planet HD 17156 b.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Planet 2M 1207 B.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Planet 2M 1207 B.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:PSR B1257+12 System.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PSR B1257+12 System.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:User:Tyrogthekreeper/Images
I have nominated user for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  03:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:HD 203857 and Planet.png
Thank you for uploading File:HD 203857 and Planet.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:24, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

File:QS Virginis b planet.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:QS Virginis b planet.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Cthulhu Mythos celestial bodies, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Hyades (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:MEarth-1 b.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MEarth-1 b.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Epsilon Tauri b and Hyades.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Epsilon Tauri b and Hyades.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Epsilon Tauri b and Hyades.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Epsilon Tauri b and Hyades.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Image modification request
Since you uploaded the image File:Tau Geminorum and brown dwarf.png, I was wondering if it might be possible for you to modify the rendering so that is shows a more accurate representation of the light from the primary being reflected off the companion? The latter should have a respectable albedo, perhaps comparable to Jupiter or Saturn, so it should be showing a bright crescent. As it is right now, the brown dwarf looks more like a black hole. Thank you. Regards, RJH (talk) 20:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Cthulhu Mythos deities, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Quicksilver and Elder God (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Ambuehl deities


The article James Ambuehl deities has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability. No references to support any sort of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BD+05 706


The article BD+05 706 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has no notable properties. Fails WP:NASTRO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 01:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NSVS 06507557


The article NSVS 06507557 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't seem to have any factors that make it notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 01:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cthulhu Mythos deities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ponape (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of U Aurigae


The article U Aurigae has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:28, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of unconfirmed extrasolar planets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Extraterrestrial places in the Cthulhu Mythos, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vela and Carina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Extraterrestrial places in the Cthulhu Mythos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lodestar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of OGLE-2007-BLG-368L for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OGLE-2007-BLG-368L is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/OGLE-2007-BLG-368L until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lithopsian (talk) 17:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)