User talk:Tyrol5/Archive 2

Thank semi-spam
Thanks for your support in my RfA, which has closed as successful. There's no need to respond on either talk; I just wanted to register my appreciation at the vote of confidence Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 14:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Organelle biogenesis
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Bye


Dffgd has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Bye!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of dffgd at 20:13, 25 August 2010 (UTC).

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Mafia2-Multiplayer
Hello Tyrol5. I am just letting you know that I deleted Mafia2-Multiplayer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 20:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

METRO Fuel Oil Corp.
Hi,

Thanks for the advice. Is there anything in particular that struck as you being particularly advertising? I tried to source everything, including product information, back to other sites, so it wouldn't sound like that. Anything you can do to help is much appreciated. Jabrams5 (talk) 20:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC) Thanks,

Jason


 * If you read through the article carefully and with a critical eye, you will see what I mean. Ex: "GreenheatTM, METRO’s custom blended bioheat, which helps home heating systems run cleaner and more efficiently" sounds like an ad. By doing this and reading through the policies I've linked for you above, the article can be drastically improved. Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * That's what it says on its website though, which I linked it to. Do you suggest I write, 'According to METRO's website' and then put a line like that in quotations?


 * Consider rewriting the phrase to be more neutral (i.e. METRO has developed a custom blended bioheat with the objective of helping home heating systems run more efficiently.). Feel free to use my wording. I would not recommend you quote the website outright, as the companies own website will more than likely be written with the purpose of promoting the company. Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Great, will do! Thanks so much. First time writer over here, so appreciate the advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jabrams5 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * You're quite welcome. If you have further questions, don't hesitate to ask! Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:12, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Taurus-Littrow
Hello! Your submission of Taurus-Littrow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Atmoz (talk) 21:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I've provided an alternative. Under the nom. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

RFA talk
Sorry to have offended you on the RFA talk page earlier. I misread the situation, and if even you had been as distressed as I wrongly believed, my response was clumsy. - Pointillist (talk) 06:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see WT:RFA, I replied there. Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Taurus-Littrow
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

RfA discussion
I judge by your response that you thought I was snapping at you. That wasn't my intention, and it wasn't directly aimed at you. It it a response to the collective discussions that have occurred over and over for the past four years. Regards, --— Cyclonenim | Chat 21:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I understand completely. After all, since this is an online discussion, I can only read your words. I cannot see your facial expression or hear your tone of voice. Anyways, thank you for clearing this up. Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

RfA thanks spam


Hello Tyrol5, thank you for supporting my RfA! I was promoted with a final tally of 65/4/3. I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations, do my best for Wikipedia, and take to heart the constructive criticism. Always feel free to message me if I'm around. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey!
Why did you take down my post on Rob Palmer's website, he did get told to fuck off by the renowned manager Harry Reddknapp


 * You need to introduce this information into the article in a way that complies with the manual of style and a credible source. The way you introduced it into the article, it was identical to blatant vandalism. Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Clerk elections
Hi, this is just to inform you that elections for Clerkship at WP:UAA have started on the talk page. You have been sent this message because you were recently active in handling submissions or discussions. Discussion is ongoing and you are encouraged to voice your opinion on the candidates.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Fridae'sDoom (talk) at 06:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC).

Thanks :)
Thanks for the wonderful support in my RfA Tyrol. I appreciated it a ton. Really. My best regards and sincere wishes.  Wifione    .......  Leave a message  15:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * You're quite welcome... you deserved it! Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Descartes Highlands
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Taurus-Littrow: peer review
Do you know what's happened to the review? There is no link on the article's talk page and I can't find it on WP:PR. Have you closed it? Brianboulton (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've closed it, as my original concerns were addressed (B-class assessment). Please feel free to leave your comments here or on the articles talk page. I apologize for the inconvenience, I intended to let you know of this. Evidently, it slipped my mind. Tyrol5   [Talk]  23:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Unless I see the peer review, I won't remember what my comments were (I deal with lots of reviews every week). If a peer review is correctly closed per the instructions at WPPR, a link remains on the article's talk page. Can you revisit your closure process?
 * Here's the link. When I moved the article, it screwed up the PR template, forcing me to remove it. I might just move the PR as well for ease of access and so I can restore the template to the TP. Tyrol5   [Talk]  23:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I have read the article again, in conjunction with my peer review. My main concerns, about prose and citations, have been addressed and the article is considerably improved. I note, however, that you appear to have removed all mention of the naming of the feature. I think this is a matter of some interest, and should be mentioned. Subject to this, I'd say the article is probably up to GA standard (I've certainly seen many worse). Brianboulton (talk) 14:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Atlantic City Beer festival
Hello Tyrol5, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Atlantic City Beer festival, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The copyvio and overtly promotional content has been removed; use PROD instead. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks as though the promo. and copyvio. material was rmv after I tagged it. Thank you, Tyrol5   [Talk]  23:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Taurus-Littrow (lunar valley)
The article Taurus-Littrow (lunar valley) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Taurus-Littrow (lunar valley) for things which need to be addressed. Bobby122  Contact Me   (C)  05:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Pharyngitis
Wondering if you have come across references to support your statements here. I have searched and the literature uses the terms frequently interchangeably. Ie. Are there any treatments / causes / complications that may occur with one but not the other. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * As I am sure you know, persistent tonsillitis will frequently require surgical treatment. This typically not the case with pharyngitis. If the treatments are different, than the complications and prognosis are likely to be different as well. The differences of course do not end here (just go into specifics of these conditions). My claims are based primarily on common sense: It is preferable to leave the articles be, simply to avoid possible confusion of the reader. Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:37, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * We also have titles of papers such as "Tonsillectomy versus watchful waiting in recurrent streptococcal pharyngitis in adults: randomised controlled trial." And "The role of tonsillectomy in reducing recurrent pharyngitis: a systematic review."  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 20:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I can see your reasoning. But, needless to say, some may be confused by merging these two articles, regardless of their similarities. I can see that these trials are using tonsillectomy to treat various type of pharyngitis, but it's not always the same, and it's these differences that justify the articles remaining separate. Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree that they are slightly different in that tonsillitis primary involves the tonsils as a sub type of pharyngitis. The question is is this sufficient to justify two separate articles. IMO the this subtle difference could be dealt with in a section on classification at the start the article. The causes overlap completely as do the treatment and prognosis / complication. If there was evidence these did not of course I would be happy to leave it as is. The literature deals with them together due to this reason. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:25, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry to butt in, but would it not be best to keep separate articles for the benefit of the reader?? Ronk01   talk  22:28, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It's quite alright. Anyways, yes, that's exactly my point. Tyrol5   [Talk]  23:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sigh I guess it is too great a step. It just means that we have a fair bit of duplication. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/The Thing That Should Not Be 2
Is it a change of vote, you voted support earlier, now your neutral. Secret account 20:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It is. I forgot to strike the vote earlier. Thanks, Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

spaceflight crew template
Hi! Thanks for doing lots of good work on the spaceflight articles lately. I recently brought up the template Spaceflight crew (discussion here), and suggested some improvements, but there seems to be little interest in changing it. I just wondered what you think of this template on Soyuz articles? I'm personally not a fan, because I don't think it makes sense to have a table where the rows correspond to "Positions", which may or may not be different.

I proposed having rows correspond to "Crew members", and gave some examples here. Another option would be to have rows like "Flight up" (with the crew in the columns), "Flight down" (with the crew in columns), and maybe in between these rows have something like "Docked to Mir for 75 days". What do you think of either of these proposals? Thanks, Mlm42 (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I never really noticed a need for a change in the template to accommodate Soyuz missions delivering long-term crews to space stations. The changes you've proposed, while they may introduce the information all in one template, would make said Soyuz articles inconsistent with other mission articles. Your current proposed new layout for the template, while I don't mean to sound unappreciative of your work, seem to be a bit 'cluttery'. And they could be a bit confusing for readers (considering your Soyuz TM-3 example). Perhaps adding a mission duration to the template is all that's really necessary? Tyrol5   [Talk]  18:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, my point is that I feel it's unnatural for the template to have "time" going left to right, which is the way it currently is. I guess my second suggestion I made to you above, is to swap the rows and columns, so that "time" flows from top to bottom. This is more consistent with spaceflight tables in general; what I'm saying is that Spaceflight crew is itself inconsistent with other spaceflight articles, because time is flowing in the wrong direction. Mlm42 (talk) 19:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I see what you're saying, but for me it seems more logical to have the launching and landing crews next to each other. In my opinion, this just makes the template more navigable. Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Comments
A 2010 Cochrane review has just come out and wondering if you could comment further  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Mission parameters
Hi, I noticed you made this edit, and added the "Mission parameters" to the Soyuz 3 article. I just want to say that I think the Mission parameters sections of spaceflight articles could be improved (in fact, I think they are better suited to the infobox). My main objection is that they are ambiguous: Is the "mass" the mass at launch, or in orbit? Since the perigee and apogee can change throughout the mission, are the parameters from the first point they reach orbit, or some kind of average for their time in orbit? Also, what is the source of this information?

More generally, do you think we should have a "Mission parameters" section on all articles of space missions? Thanks, Mlm42 (talk) 23:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)


 * You're right, it does seem a bit redundant, but I was merely trying to keep the article consistent with other articles. I don't know if it's the best thing to do, however, to go around and take all of the sections off all the articles. It does provide quick access to basic info. As for the ambiguous parameter specifics, I couldn't help you there as I just copied from the infobox, which seems to get its info from sources with equally ambiguous params. Tyrol5   [Talk]  01:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!


Collaboration
The current medicine collaboration is Cancer. As you previously commented at WT:HEMONC, I wanted to make sure you knew that you were welcome to help us improve the article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Pavel Petrovich Parenago
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  00:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

WT:RFA
Per your request to stay notified of current developments, see Eureka! We're all morons. - Dank (push to talk) 22:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Tyro, I was impressed with your recent advice to a new user. I'm not generally in favour of the Wikipedia system of templates for absolutely everything, but if there were to be a standard template response for situations like this, your message would be the one I would choose and use. --Kudpung (talk) 08:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate that! Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

i dont understand what your problem with me posting about the westboro baptist church is? do you support them as i am quoting wikipedia's entry on them not my personal oppinion. that being said if you continue to delete my entries then i will continually repost them and if my ip gets banned i will use a different IP and continue to repost... thank you for your understanding in this matter. wikipedia is open discussion or rather its open to free contribution which you have censored my contribution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.120.231 (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Your edit indeed appeared to be vandalism by listing this organization as a domestic terrorism organization when it is not explicitly classified as such (a quick search shows no mention of terrorism in the article about the organization). You are correct in saying that anyone can freely contribute to the encyclopedia, but incorrect in the methodology of your edit. When adding controversial information such as this, you must provide a reliable source to support the information. Thank you. Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the help on my talk page
I know precisely who the culprit is and am, to say the least, not at all concerned - but it's good to have the might of wiki volunteers looking out for me. Keep up the good work! Egg Centric 21:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, glad to help! Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for the quick revert on my talk page! – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 21:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Always glad to help out! Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi
I don`t understand why page Currency cannot be linked to page currate.com,currate got grat tools which will help users to calculate currancy very easy,and currate also has a map tool,with that tourist can easily calculate currency everywhere they go,because they don`t need to know what is the currancy in that country. Thank You! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.125.153.24 (talk) 22:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Adding links to specific sites is considered spam according to this policy. Please avoid adding these links, as they appear to promote that particular site. Thank you, Tyrol5   [Talk]  22:27, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

RfA reform
Hi. I have now moved the RfA reform and its associated pages to project space. The main page has been updated and streamlined. We now also have a new table on voter profiles. Please take a moment to check in and keep the pages on your watchlist. Regards, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IAFPlogo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:IAFPlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Arbitration clerking
In relation to our discussion last week about your interest in arbitration clerking, I have sent you an e-mail on behalf of the clerks. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any more questions. Regards, AGK  [&bull; ] 21:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

That RfA Reform thing
Kudpung has asked me to 'nudge' some people .. as I'm an idle get, I'm just going through the entire Task Force list so my apologies if you didn't need a nudge! You can slap me about over on WP:EfD if you like :o) Straw polling various options: over here - please add views, agree with views, all that usual stuff. Pesky  ( talk ) 12:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fra Mauro formation
The article Fra Mauro formation you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fra Mauro formation for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Szzuk (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Tyrol5   [Talk]  14:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

GA Review of Soyuz TM-30
I've left a few observations here and the review is now on hold. Malleus Fatuorum 22:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Drew clements
Hello Tyrol5. I am just letting you know that I deleted Drew clements, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

listas parameter on latin names
Please do not do any more listas on Latin or Icelandic names from Category:Biography articles without listas parameter. Alot of Latin and Icelandic names do not have surnames but have patronymic names. However quite of few do have surnames. It can get very complicated to figure out as you may have to see grandparent names and check web sources to make sure. Also the DEFAULTSORT value in the article would need to be changed. An expert on both is sick and is off wiki at the moment. Bgwhite (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Will do. Thank you for bringing this to my attention, I will keep it in mind. Thanks, Tyrol5   [Talk]  22:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have a list of the Latin, Icelandic and few names I don't know what to do with.  So, there was no harm done.  However, looking at the list of names, it does look much better with letters A thru C cleaned off... gives me a little more happiness to see an emptier list. Bgwhite (talk) 05:36, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Borders of the lung merger
Hi, I'm proposing to merge the anatomy articles Posterior border of lung, Anterior border of lung, and Inferior border of lung into one article: Borders of the lung. There's no consensus on the issue, and since it is supported by the Pulmonology task force, I was wondering if you could add your opinion at the merger discussion here: Talk:Borders of the lung.

Thanks,K e rowyn Leave a note 21:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your input! ~ K e rowyn Leave a note 16:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. Tyrol5   [Talk]

Barnstar
Best wishes. Axl ¤  [Talk]  21:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot! It's nice to here from you again, as I've found more of my time devoted to the space-related articles. Please rest assured that I check in to WT:MED periodically. Thanks again! Tyrol5   [Talk]  22:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

QTalk Arizona
While yes, the user who created the article has a promotional username. But how is the article promotional? -Porchcrop (talk 14:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The user has changed the article since I've tagged it. See, for example, the "Individual Shows" section at the time that I tagged it in this diff. Per this change and the willingness of the user to avoid a conflict of interest, I've de-requested speedy deletion. Tyrol5   [Talk]  13:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Pityful
Hi there TYROL, VASCO here,

regarding this situation (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:86.44.154.132), i feel there is less and less i can add to it, except shaking my head in utter disgust. Another obscure player was vandalized, but this was not about the player, 99,999999999999% sure it was about...ME!

One year ago, i protected some pages/blocked one or two IPs for vandalism and, what did i get i return? This English "user" has been on my case ever since, vandalizing the stuff i work on, just to spite me. If he sees my message to you, i better get ready for some more taunting, pathetic. Pathetic and pityful! More pathetic is writing "i apologize" in his page after receiving three warnings for writing and kind of vile crap in an article, DELIBERATELY vandalizing...

Keep up the good work, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry that xe has caused you trouble; how did you make the connection, though? Did the user once have an account or did you request CU? Tyrol5   [Talk]  18:01, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * No, this "user" has never had any account that i know of, "contributing" solely with anon IPs (all starting with 88 or 86, all from England, has even vandalized my userpage and sent some graphic photos to there and to my talkpage). Like i say early into my original message, i am not 100% sure, my reasoning being: it's an obscure player that i doubt anyone knows about in most countries, he's not known for anything good or bad in particular (i admit i have NEVER seen him play, only edited there because he plays for a team in my country), so the only reason for the vandalism has got to be that I edited there, nothing else. The "user" is trying to get me to feed the troll, and eventually he will succeed, unfortunately.


 * Cheers - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 20:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * My only advice in that case would be to report the IP's if the disruptions continue. If xe continues to switch IP's (again, this is pure speculation at this point), I would suggest contacting a CU for advice, as this is beyond my scope of knowledge. Best wishes. Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

File Mover
Hey, have you tried requesting to be a WP:FILEMOVER? C T J F 8 3 22:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I haven't, but I suppose I might as well; it'd be quite useful. Tyrol5   [Talk]  18:45, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Good, you got it! Now I won't have to rename 20ish files in a row again...you can do it yourself! :) C T J F 8 3  19:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Task force WP:RFA2011 update
Hi. As of 20 June: More stats have been added on candidates and !voter participation. Details have been added about qualifications required on other Wikis for candidates and RfA !voters. Some items such as clerking, !voters, and candidates are nearing proposal stage. A quick page`link template has been added to each page of the project. Please visit those links to get up to speed with recent developments, and chime in with your comments. Thanks for your participation.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 07:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC).

Thanks for rvv
Left you a note at User talk:207.157.121.52. 207.157.121.92 (talk) 17:46, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Your input is requested
Greetings!

As a member of the RfA improvement task force, your input is requested at the possible proposals page, which consists of ideas that have not yet been discussed or developed.

Please look though the ideas and leave a comment on the talk page on the proposal(s) you would most like to see go forward. Your feedback will help decide which proposals to put to the community. And, as always, feel free to add new suggestions. Thanks!

Swarm, coordinator, RfA reform 2011

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 07:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC).

Ozvoo
ozvoo is a well known site in India and delhi..How can it be an advertisement for something famous? and it is founded by Himanshu Pal, the name is similar to mine but it is bcz my choice of username was already taken up!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himanshujaju (talk • contribs) 12:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Regardless of the website's notability, the article is written in a way that it reads like an advertisement (namely the parts that pitch the site over Facebook), and would need a significant re-write in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please see this policy for more information. Tyrol5   [Talk]  13:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * please tell me which parts to edit and create a successful wiki article!Himanshujaju (talk) 13:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Although the promotional material can be removed from the article, the article's subject does not appear to pass the notability guideline for websites. Tyrol5   [Talk]  13:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)