User talk:Tyrol5/Archive 3

Articles for deletion/Partners for Democratic Change
I've made significant improvements to the structure and verifiability of Partners for Democratic Change. Would you be willing to review your vote on its deletion? Thanks! i kan reed (talk) 16:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ Good work. Tyrol5   [Talk]  16:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Josh Manley
Hi Tyro. I'm just  letting  you  know that  I  deleted the above page as G10 attack  and not  vandalism  as you  had tagged it. It was quite a nasty piece of blatant  slander. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for alerting me; it was a bit of a tricky one, in hindsight I suppose I should have marked it for G10 to courtesy blank it, but it appeared to me to be merely misinformation to the point of vandalism (read like an autobio). At any rate, thanks again. Tyrol5   [Talk]  15:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, with all the filthy language in it, I'm surprised it didn't trip the filters, but maybe I beat them to it :) --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Might have something to do with the fact that the username of the creator contained "Josh", prompting suspicion of an autobio (that's what I thought myself); plus the first sentence threw me off (something along the lines of ambitious, goal-setting, etc.). Good work nonetheless. Tyrol5   [Talk]  15:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Respiratory disease article
Hey - the docs wanted me to tell you to check [] re the discussion on the Respiratory disease article. Talk to you later. Best regards: Cliff Knickerbocker, M.S. (&#91;&#91;User talk:Uploadvirus&#124;talk&#93;&#93;) (talk) 16:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Will take a look; thanks for alerting me. Tyrol5   [Talk]  17:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Alameda abuses students
is that really what you wanted it to say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.41.52.7 (talk) 19:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That appeared to be leftover from a previous vandal's edit. Your edit resembled vandalism in that you added the acronym "lol" to the article instead of properly fixing it. Keep this in mind for next time. Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)


 * i was just pointing it out for you :) nice work — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.41.52.7 (talk) 20:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. And remember&mdash;please feel free to remove vandalism upon spotting it! Tyrol5   [Talk]  12:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:RFA2011: RfA on other Wikipedias
A detailed table and notes have now been created and posted. It compares how RfA is carried out on   major Wikipedias (English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). If you feel  that other important language  Wikipedias should be added, please let  us know. This may however depend on  our/your language skills!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 22:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC).

Barnstar
Thank you! =)!-- Jc a  ra b allo   16:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome; you deserved it! Tyrol5   [Talk]  16:39, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

{

Your GA nomination of Mir EO-19
The article Mir EO-19 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Mir EO-19 for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review; will address the concerns shortly. Tyrol5   [Talk]  23:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Great work with the successful GA! Unfortunately all the astronautix.com references should probably now be replaced, since the website now appears to be gone.. Mlm42 (talk) 03:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for letting me know. The refs have been replaced by screenshots of astronautix pages from web archives. Tyrol5   [Talk]  13:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

YGM

 * Thanks. I've replied. Tyrol5   [Talk]  11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Linking Letters, new metal band
Hey, um.. Yeah, the reason they possibly may not seem of much importance to you or anything like that is probably 'cause you've never heard of them. There BRAND NEW. I mean seriously, they're gonna be HUGE. Put my page back up man, it'll be updated about twice a week at least, promise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axel Psych (talk • contribs) 20:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, this band does not pass our notability guideline for musical ensembles. Thus it is inappropriate to include in an encyclopedia at this time. Thanks, Tyrol5   [Talk]  11:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Good luck!
Good luck in hell week! Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate the kind sentiment and your support! Regards, Tyrol5   [Talk]  17:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * And it looks like you are about to pass unopposed! Nice job! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 'Tis not over 'til the fat lady sings! Anyway, thanks very much for your support and good luck yourself! Tyrol5   [Talk]  12:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

File:The human lungs.png
It's not enough for me to oppose over it (because it was from over two years ago), but please properly give descriptions and sources for your images. File:The human lungs.png appears to have been cropped from File:Inhalation diagram.svg (it would have been better to do it as an SVG, but that's a completely unrelated topic and obviously not everyone has an SVG editor at their disposal, which is completely understandable). Even though you are under no legal obligation to credit the original uploader since she did release her work into the public domain, not crediting the source is still considered plagiarism. You should give the image a meaningful description and properly credit the source. --B (talk) 00:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Stupid mistake on my part, duly admitted. Thank you for kindly bringing this to my attention. Tyrol5   [Talk]  00:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Glad to help and thank you for taking care of it so quickly. --B (talk) 02:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Colds7ream (talk) 16:22, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

You are now an administrator
Congratulations on your recent (unanimous!) RFA. I've flipped some bits around and now you can cause all manner of harm with the touch of a few buttons. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. Happy adminning, – xeno talk 13:12, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Now off to delete the main page and indef. Jimbo! Thanks a lot Xeno! Tyrol5   [Talk]  13:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Congrats! Good luck with Jimbo's indef, let me know how that turns out for you.--v/r - TP 14:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Won't be pretty, I'm sure; it'll be the first and last block of my adminship! Tyrol5   [Talk]  14:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Heartiest congrats! You won't  find much of any  use in  my  vector.js page, but  my  toolbox is very  heavy  and full of a mess of useful stuff for admins that  you  are welcome to  plunder. Do what  you  like to  the main  page, just  don't  delete my  user page! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Now adding Kudpung's userpage to list of pages to delete... In all seriousness, thank you for your congrats and wonderful support; it is much appreciated! Regards, Tyrol5   [Talk]  16:22, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * There was never a doubt you would pass, but still it's good to see it formally acknowledged. You'll be an excellent administrator. --  At am a  頭 17:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your confidence in my abilities and your support Atama, 'tis much appreciated! I will strive to live up to the trust the community has invested in me. Tyrol5   [Talk]  17:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

While I remember before we run out of stock (fat chance!), I'll give you this T-shirt to wear when you are editing. It'll save messing up your normal clothes while doing admin dirty work. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Kudpung! I almost forgot about the shirt! Tyrol5   [Talk]  11:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Congrats Tyrol :) sorry I missed your RfA! —  James ( Talk •  Contribs ) • 9:46am • 23:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It's quite alright; thanks for the kind thought M.O.X.! Tyrol5   [Talk]  01:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

RfA reform
Hi Tyrol. I've left a more comprehensive reply  for you  both  on  my  talk  page, to  which  I'll  add, that  although  we need to  keep  an even balance between coordinators and the task  force members, you  are most  welcome to  put  your name on  the coord list and try  to  galvanise people into  action. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I may very well do so in the future but, alas, the present may not be the best time for me to assume such a role as my RL schedule picks up a bit in the next week or so. Tyrol5   [Talk]  18:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

AUTOP
Thanks man! Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 19:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem; keep up the good work. Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:12, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Re. CSD
Noted, thanks! Bejinhan  talks   02:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. Tyrol5   [Talk]  13:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

2011 Virginia earthquake
Oh god this always happens to me, I thought you added that line and that I was reverting it. No harm intended. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions  19:00, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it; these current event articles are always real fun to edit, especially when you get six edit conflicts before you actually edit the article. Thanks for addressing the issue. Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * LOL I agree happy editing! Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions   19:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks a bunch. I really appreciate it. XD Keep up the good work too! The GAs you've written on space missions and lunar formations have actually been really interesting and informative to me. I remember reading Fra Mauro formation, and then hearing Tom Hanks mention it on Apollo 13. I was excited. :) --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:29, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your compliments! And I'm glad you enjoyed the GAs I've contributed to! All the best, Tyrol5   [Talk]  11:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

WASP-13 GA review
Just dropped by to say thanks for taking on the review. I really, really do appreciate it. :) --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:19, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem at all. Keep up the good work. Regards, Tyrol5   [Talk]  00:25, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review of Hadley–Apennine
Hi, Tyrol. I've tackled the GA review, and it is presently on hold. Good work, and keep it up. :) --Starstriker7(Talk) 02:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for your comprehensive review! I'll begin resolving the issues shortly. Tyrol5   [Talk]  11:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You are welcome! Good work with resolving the comments I posted, and with (again) writing these articles in general. :) --Starstriker7(Talk) 02:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Good Article promotion

 * Thank you! Regards, Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:02, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * And Hadley–Apennine (lunar region) too! You're on a roll! – Quadell (talk) 14:46, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Request to Userfy recently deleted page
RiskVal was deleted recently while I was in the middle of working on it. I had put in the framework but wanted to work on content separately so I could provide a clean first draft before community edits started happening. I should have planned it out in a user space or sandbox instead of making a separate page before it was ready.

One concern though. I had put the newpage tag at the top and I understood that said notice would give me at least a day of editing before the article was even considered for deletion while I was still working on it. Why does the tag exist if people ignore it? What's the point?

There wasn't much to the page but I'd appreciate if it could be userfied so I wouldn't have to redo it :D Thank you for your time, Spideygoturback (talk) 21:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ The draft can now be found at User:Spideygoturback/RiskVal. As for your concern, User:Nikthestoned is correct in saying that newpage is more for those experienced in article work and, thus, not a first-time article creator like yourself, who should draft the article in the userspace first. Good luck and regards, Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

RfA Reform update
Hi. It's been a little while since the last message on RfA reform, and there's been a fair amount of slow but steady progress. However, there is currently a flurry of activity due to some conversations on Jimbo's talk page.

I think we're very close to putting an idea or two forward before the community and there are at least two newer ones in the pipeline. So if you have a moment:
 * Have a look at the min requirement proposal and familiarise yourself with the statistics, I'd appreciate comment on where we should put the bar.
 * Any final comments would be appreciated on the clerks proposal.
 * Feedback on the two newer proposals - Pre-RfA & RfA reform 2011/Sysop on request. Both are more radical reforms of RfA and might run along side the current system.

Thanks for reading and for any comments that you've now made.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 21:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC).

News and progress from RfA reform 2011
(You are receiving this message because you are either a task force member, or you have contributed to recent discussions on any of these pages.)

The number of nominations continues to nosedive seriously, according to  these monthly figures. We know why this is, and if the trend continues our reserve of active admins will soon be underwater. Wikipedia now needs suitable editors to come forward. This can only be achieved either through changes to the current system, a radical alternative, or by fiat from elsewhere.

A lot of work is constantly being done behind the scenes by the coordinators and task force members, such as monitoring the talk pages, discussing new ideas, organising  the project  pages, researching  statistics and keeping  them  up  to  date. You'll also see for example that  we have recently  made tables to  compare how other Wikipedias choose  their sysops, and some tools have been developed to more closely examine !voters' habits.

The purpose of WP:RFA2011 is to focus attention on  specific issues of our  admin  selection  process and to develop  RfC proposals for solutions to improve them. For this, we have organised the project into dedicated sections each with their own discussion pages. It is important to understand that  all Wikipedia policy changes take a long  time to implement whether or not the discussions appear to  be active - getting the proposals right before offering them for discussion by the broader community is crucial to the success of any RfC. Consider keeping the pages and their talk pages on your watchlist; do check out older threads before starting a new one on topics that have been discussed already, and if you start a new thread, please revisit it regularly to follow up on new comments.

The object of WP:RFA2011 is not  to make it  either  easier or harder to  become an admin -  those criteria are set by  those who  !vote at  each  RfA. By providing  a unique venue for developing ideas for  change independent  of  the general discussion  at  WT:RFA, the project has two  clearly  defined goals: The fastest way is through improvement to the current system. Workspace is however also available within the project  pages to  suggest  and discuss ideas that are not  strictly  within  the remit  of this project. Users are invited to make use of these pages where they  will  offer maximum exposure to  the broader community, rather than individual  projects in  user space.
 * 1) Improving the environment  that  surrounds RfA in  order to  encourage mature, experienced editors of the right  calibre to  come forward, pass the interview, and dedicate some of their  time to  admin  tasks.
 * 2) Discouraging, in the nicest  way  possible of course, those whose RfA will be obvious NOTNOW or SNOW, and to  guide them towards the advice pages.

We already know what's wrong with RfA - let's not clutter the project with perennial chat. RFA2011 is now ready to propose some of the elements of reform, and all the task force needs to do now is to pre-draft those proposals in the project's workspace, agree on the wording, and then offer them for central discussion where the entire Wikipedia community will be more than welcome to express their opinions in  order to  build consensus.

New tool Check your RfA !voting history! Since the editors' RfA !vote counter at X!-Tools has been down for a long while, we now have a new RfA Vote Counter to replace it. A significant improvement on the former tool, it provides a a complete breakdown of an editor's RfA votes, together with an analysis of the participant's voting pattern.

Are you ready to help? Although the main engine of RFA2011 is its task force, constructive comments from any  editors are always welcome on  the project's various talk  pages. The main reasons  why  WT:RfA was never successful in  getting  anything  done are that threads on different aspects of RfA are all mixed together, and are then archived where nobody  remembers them and where they  are hard to  find - the same is true of ad hoc threads on  the founder's talk  page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 16:05, 25 September 2011 (UTC).

Number...whatever it was
Thanks for your message, but I'm afraid I haven't got a clue what your on about! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.16.40.78 (talk) 17:09, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That was a warning for disruptive editing from April of this year. If you have a shared IP address, that might be why (assuming it wasn't you who made the edit). A quick and easy solution to this would be to create an account, but it's up to you. Regards, Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Cgdotcom
You seem to have forgotten to watch this page. They responded to your attempt to discuss some time ago. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for alerting me, Beeblebrox, I've replied to them on their talk page. Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:59, 30 October 2011 (UTC).

United States Senate elections, 1822
Thanks for adding this article, which was sadly absent. I tweaked the charts to reflect some of the numbers in 17th United States Congress and 18th United States Congress regarding the different factions of Federalists and Dem-Reps. Thanks again, and keep it up! —GoldRingChip 18:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * You're quite welcome, and thanks for tweaking the charts (I wasn't quite sure how to go about representing the factions, but I'm glad it's now more concise). Thanks again and regards, Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks! I appreciate it! Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:51, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes good work. I guess, I was too slow with User talk:William S. Saturn/Sandbox. --William S. Saturn (talk) 04:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we could combine the work and make it an FA.--William S. Saturn (talk) 04:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That'd be great! I'll begin moving some information over (endorsements, etc.). Tyrol5   [Talk]  15:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Barry Goldwater presidential campaign, 1964 GA review on hold
You are the GA nominator on this article. I did a GA review for it and nobody has responded. The nomination will fail in 3 days if no improvements are made. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 15:06, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Astrocog, I appreciate it. I have noticed that you reviewed the article, but I haven't yet set aside enough time to address the issues, which I expect to do in the next day or two. While I have you, what specific images had insufficient fair-use rationales? Thanks, Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

GAN for Apollo 16
Hi. I finally finished my review of Apollo 16 and placed the GAN on hold pending resolution of a couple of minor concerns. You can find the review here. –Grondemar 06:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for addressing my concerns; I have now passed this good article nomination.  Congratulations! –Grondemar 21:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I appreciate it! Tyrol5   [Talk]  22:59, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited United States elections, 1952, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited New Hampshire Republican primary, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Institute of Science & Technology
Greetings! Is there a specific reason you've added the editprotected template to this talk page? The page itself isn't protected, so you don't need to request an edit. Tyrol5  [Talk]  15:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello there, Yes,I'av editprotected the page because some people who are not even linked to this institution are trying to give useless edits & removing some of its useful contents. Argha.hazra (talk)


 * I've replied on your talk page. We can continue there as needed. Thanks, Tyrol5   [Talk]  16:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

US Orbital Segment
Hi Tyrol5, I just went through a major overhaul (complete rewrite) of the US Orbital Segment article. I have tagged it for copy edit, but I was wondering if maybe you could give it a peak. I would like to get it out of stub category, but I am not the best in grammar. I want to have all my ducks in a row before I request an assessment of it at the spaceflight project. If you see anything else that might be a problem, let me know. Thanks in advance-- Navy Blue84  17:08, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Absolutely. Just give me a day or so and I'll take a look. Tyrol5   [Talk]  03:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Awesome, thanks alot!-- Navy Blue84  13:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for waiting. I've now copyedited the article and have taken the liberty of illustrating it with a few more images. Overall, a very superb job in supplying the article with much more information (it most definitely needed expansion); it was a pleasure to read. Most of the copyedits were minor (grammar, punctuation and so forth) relative to the work you put into rewriting it. It's certainly ready for reassessment. Don't hesitate to let me know if you'd like another set of eyes in the future. Tyrol5   [Talk]  01:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for taking a look at it. You beat me to the punch on the images! I am now going to list it for re-assessment, and hope for the best. Thanks-- Navy Blue84  13:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Glad to be of assistance. Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)



MSU Interview
Dear Tyrol5,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and

Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's

Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we

teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community,

and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what

you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community

[[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_82#Learn_to_be_a_Wikipedia_Administrator_-

_New_class_at_MSU|HERE]], where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my

students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training,

motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one

of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of

communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will

never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an

interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics

review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have

been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak

with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I

will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your

name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be

more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Young June Sah --Yjune.sah (talk) 21:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I've added myself on the list linked to above. Thanks for your interest and good luck with the project. Tyrol5   [Talk]  16:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited William A. Barrett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Joseph's College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Just a quick thanks for deleting my pages, and sorry for the trouble. Cheers Kinkreet (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No trouble at all. Ever need anything else, drop me a line and I'll be around. Tyrol5   [Talk]  01:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage
I have left a note on the page, where you declined by request. ~ &#8658;TomTom  N00  @ 20:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've replied. Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

 * Thanks. I'm certain that, with more experience and more care put into ensuring your article creations use references as needed and don't have any major issues, you'll be approved for the right w/out problem. Tyrol5   [Talk]  17:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia 1.0
Hi Tyrol5, I'm a member of the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team which organizes offline releases of Wikipedia. We're trying to identify which members are still active, so we can start to work on our next general offline release, Version 0.9, being discussed here. Please add your comments to the discussion, and let us know here if you would like to be involved with 0.9. If you want just to stick to assessing articles, we appreciate that too. Please let me know. Thanks! Walkerma (talk) 04:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Good Job
Tyrol5, I was just looking up François Hollande, as he is the new President of France and I saw a mistake in the opening paragraph of the article. As I went to correct it, I didn't see the mistake anymore. I saw that you corrected it just seconds earlier. I wanted to thank you for your diligence and hard work on the this website and hope to contribute with you in the future. Metsfreak2121 (talk) 19:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I'm always more than happy to do what I can. Great work on your contribs as well! See you around, Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

CGWLaw → RobynMay
Hi Thanks for the update, can I please change to RobynM78. CGWLaw (talk) 01:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)CGWLaw /RobynMay
 * That'd be alright, but as I'm not a bureaucrat, you'd have to ask at your request for one to see it. Thanks, Tyrol5   [Talk]  01:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Happy anniversary!

 * Thanks! Tyrol5   [Talk]  21:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

De-adminship reform
Hi Tyrol. Last year, de-adminship reform was considered out of scope by WP:RfA reform 2011, and you created User:Tyrol5/De-adminship reform. Unfortunately, that never really got off the ground - but I thought I might come to you to help out with User:Worm That Turned/Community De-adminship proof of concept, I'm hoping to get an RfC together to judge the community's view on "community de-adminship". I know this isn't going to be a short process, there's a reason it's perennial, but I thought it would be a good way to start. Would appreciate any thoughts.  Worm TT( talk ) 12:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)