User talk:Tywho

Image copyright problem with Image:Rah_colonel2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rah_colonel2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Text copyright problem with Rah Crawford
You've dropped in significant amounts of text that are copies of text found at http://rahcrawford.com/ We can't use copyrighted text in an article at WP. eaolson 03:27, 30 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Please do not continue to repost material that has been removed from articles for infringing copyrights, as you have recently been doing with the article Rah Crawford. This is against Wikipedia's copyright policies. If you persist in reposting copyrighted text, it may result in you being blocked from editing. eaolson 15:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm soory but ignoring us will do no good. If you think the text is not a copyvio explain yourself. If you ignore the people who are trying to talk to you and simply go on readding the text over and over you will find yourself blocked, which would be a shame. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 16:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I put a response to your question over at Talk:Rah Crawford. eaolson 02:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Rah Crawford for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rah Crawford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rah Crawford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Redbio.jpg


The file File:Redbio.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:RahCrawford cupid.jpg


The file File:RahCrawford cupid.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)