User talk:TzPGZ

Club Sportivo Gloria moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Club Sportivo Gloria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 09:32, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Rijeka/Kvarner
The name was bilingual so both "Kvarner" and "Quarnero" were official names between 1946 and 1954, however there is ZERO reasons that the Italian name would be used in the Yugoslav football system, check some old newspapers from ex-yugoslavia and you would see that they always used the name "Kvarner" when playing in Yugoslavia, obviously. Snowflake91 (talk) 15:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The name was initially Italian, because the city was almost 100% Italian speaking in 1946. Only a couple of months later the SD Kvarner part is added, and the club is officially first language Italian / second language Croatian until the early '50s, and it is thus known as "Quarnero" in the English-language press (the city is known internationally as with the Italian name Fiume well into the '60s).
 * Moreover, the club is called exclusively Quarnero in the local press of those years, because the main city language is still Italian until the '50s. Do you use the Croatian name for Ponziana (Poncijana) for the club from Trieste that played in the same same league those years? No. This is why it makes fully sense to use Quarnero for the English Wiki.


 * Slovenian, Croatian (except Fiume area), Serbian etc. newspapers and league officials definitely used Kvarner and not Quarnero, also the websites that cover those leagues, like there and there. And also RSSSF, which is one of the most reliable sources for football, uses Kvarner for 1946-47. Snowflake91  (talk) 15:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinrich von Littrow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austrian Lloyd. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

NK Šparta 1913 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, NK Šparta 1913, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NK Lošinj


The article NK Lošinj has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not enough in-depth coverage found to satisfy WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:FOOTYN."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:49, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Club Sportivo Gloria
Hello, TzPGZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Club Sportivo Gloria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:NK Šparta 1913
Hello, TzPGZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NK Šparta 1913, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Fiumei Atletikai Club
Hello, TzPGZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fiumei Atletikai Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)