User talk:Tzusheng/sandbox/Wikipedia:Wikibench/Entity:Diff/1162926211/1162926244

Vandalism
This obvious vandalism makes me think of something. Sometimes I see vandalism and I want to revert it and use Wikibench to mark it as damaging. It would be nice to have a feature that was like “Save and revert” that would save our ratings and revert the edit. Thoughts @Fehufanga, @Actualcpscm, @PriusGod? - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 14:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Personally, I really don't like the idea of Wikibench tools interacting directly with the article namespace. It's very important to me to separate paid contributions (edit evaluations) from other work, and this blurs the lines quite a bit. I wouldn't want to use this, so if implemented, I'd really appreciate making it optional. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * That makes sense, and my suggestion would be making it optional. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 14:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I had a suggestion during the first meeting that maybe Wikibench might examine user actions on anti-vandalism plugins, for example there might be an option to have Wikibench automatically interpret the pseudo-rollback buttons on Twinkle - AGF rollback would label the reverted edit(s) damaging/good faith, vandalism rollback would label them damaging/bad faith, regular rollback would not automatically commit a label. I understand different users use those buttons differently, and I've been guilty of hitting [vandalism] on an edit that is just obviously low quality (rather than obviously vandalistic) before, but that's why it would be an optional feature.
 * This way, Wikibench would observe mainspace behavior of participants and reflect that into the data, rather than making it so the data entry tool makes changes to mainspace. I think this would ameliorate at least some of the concern about Wikibench interacting with mainspace (though it wouldn't necessarily resolve the entire issue. PriusGod (talk) 17:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * That would be a really cool feature to have or at least consider, although as mentioned above I wouldn‘t use it as long as I could be considered a paid editor for Wikibench. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:48, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I completely agree and also stated similar in my opening interview. I’d say that being compatible with anti vandalism tools is a good idea, but very difficult to integrate. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 03:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)