User talk:U-Mos/Archives/2019/January

Requested move user talk page posts
Just curious, is there a reason why you reached out to two editors in particular about the requested move for the Christmas/New Year's specials article, with posts that state "This page is of interest to this WikiProject", that does not violate WP:CANVAS? Thanks. -- / Alex /21  23:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Per WP:APPNOTE, these editors (and yourself) were involved in an earlier discussion on the article's scope. Amending my negligent copy/pasting to remove WikiProject mention now, thanks for the heads up. U-Mos (talk) 23:28, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Three reverts
I'll leave the article as is for now, to satisfy you, but just out of curiousity, can you link me my "three reverts"? I can only count two; I know this isn't one, as it is not a revert in any sense of the word. Trying to find the third one. Cheers. -- / Alex /21  10:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * That edit reverts the initial placing of Colman above Jacobi on the cast list. My edit summary misread the 50 minute timespan from a different pair of edits, but otherwise I stand by it. I really think you need to reflect upon your attitude in editing Wikipedia, for the good of the projects you partake in and the community. This situation at Les Miserables is identical to that we disagreed on at List of Doctor Who episodes (2005-present) - a dispute over interpreting of guidelines - only with our roles reversed. In the previous case, as I have acknowledged I missed the ambiguity in the guidelines and you were therefore correct to treat it as a WP:BOLD edit and revert accordingly. Now I am doing the same, as well as addressing the issue with the guidelines elsewhere, and you are refusing to follow the very same process you evoked mere days ago and seek a consensus. I'm struggling to see this as anything other than an WP:OWNERSHIP issue at this point. It's not on, and you are individually making editing these articles a needlessly unpleasant experience. It's a real shame. U-Mos (talk) 11:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, regarding the edit I made to the guest cast: Since the page revert was due to the placement of Colman, I decided to reinstate the information I had previously added. Apologies for any complications I may have caused. DantesWeb (talk) 13:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You were correct to do so; that supposed status quo undid several unobjectionable edits. No issue at all. U-Mos (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * , quite right. -- / Alex /21  22:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * A revert is an opposing action; the opposite of adding content would be removing it, which is not what happened. That confirms my two reverts. I've been here for almost five years, and I'm still here, editing as ever, just as happy. But thanks for the heads up for both. -- / Alex /21  13:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)