User talk:U.S.historyjunkie

December 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Neo-Confederate have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Neo-Confederate was changed by U.S.historyjunkie (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870921 on 2021-12-13T19:30:38+00:00

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stonewall Jackson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. BusterD (talk) 20:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Stonewall Jackson has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. BusterD (talk) 20:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, U.S.historyjunkie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Lost Cause of the Confederacy does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BusterD (talk) 20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Stonewall Jackson
My reasons where valid on the stonewall Jackson page. What I removed was only there to push a political agenda U.S.historyjunkie (talk) 14:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)