User talk:U.faizan85

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bentham Science Publishers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bentham Science Publishers was changed by U.faizan85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853867 on 2011-08-02T06:32:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers'''


The article List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers''' has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. This list does not establish why any of the individual publications on the list are notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VQuakr (talk) 07:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers


The article List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. This list does not establish why any of the individual publications on the list are notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VQuakr (talk) 07:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers'''


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers'''. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. VQuakr (talk) 07:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 07:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers


A tag has been placed on List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

''This is a near replication of the article Bentham Science Publishers, which includes a list of prominent journals, and there is already a category of journals published by aforesaid publisher. This page is redundant and unnecessary, and in any event is essentially a copy-paste from the publishers website.''

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pstanton (talk) 07:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 07:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Impact factor titles of Bentham Science Publishers - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. VQuakr (talk) 07:27, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr (talk) 07:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Current Molecular Medicine Journal


A tag has been placed on Current Molecular Medicine Journal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Nik the  stoned  09:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Current Molecular Medicine Journal


A tag has been placed on Current Molecular Medicine Journal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Nik the  stoned  09:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Current Alzheimer Research Journal


A tag has been placed on Current Alzheimer Research Journal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Nik the  stoned  10:03, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Current Alzheimer Research Journal
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Current Alzheimer Research Journal, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry


A tag has been placed on Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Nik the  stoned  09:22, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikilinks
Hi, it's a bit tiresome that I have to correct you wikilinks each time. Please have a look at what I did. The articles you have created on several Bentham journal are pretty good and (importantly) neutral. I am doing some edits, again, have a look so that I don't have to keep repeating this. Happy editing! --Crusio (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

journal pages copyuvio
Please do not copy the mission statement or fields of coverage from the journal web site, but write a brief summary of your own. Then our automatic copyvio detector will not detect them. Crusio and I have been fixing the mistakes, but we might not always be able to.  DGG ( talk ) 12:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

J. Medicinal Chemistry
I could not document some of the material in the article, and consequetly removed it.

I could not ifind an outside source that the ed. in Chief is associated currently with the Penna. (Institute of Hepatitis and Virus Research), and substituetd his position at Fox Chase Chemical Diversity Center. If he is associated with the Institute, please find a curent source outside of Bentham that shows this, and also shows what is position is there.

I also could not verify that the journal contains anything other than review articles, based upon examination of some issues of the journals. Nor does it say on the journal page that it is other than a review journal. We normally for  list only one outside link, the journal main page. People can get to the others from there.

The way to have a list of your journals is the category page. Don't try to include a list article also. It is not currently accepted for this type of subject. That;s what the company web page is for.

Please be more careful. If you continue in the manner you have been going, you are likely to encounter some strong resistance from people here who may not necessarily understand academic journals, but do understand promotional writing and copyright.

As some general advice on journals: Based on what is generally accepted here, an article about a journal  should    contain:
 * 1) Full titles, any earlier titles, and the corresponding dates. Make cross references from any variant titles.
 * 2) Standard abbreviations used--make redirects from them.
 * 3) publishing & sponsoring body, as well as earlier publishers & sponsors
 * 4) availability on line
 * 5) no. of articles published a year
 * 6) ISSNs for both print and online versions
 * 7) Online availability of current and earlier issues
 * 8) Open access availability, if relevant.
 * 9) Circulation (sourced somewhere--default place to get it is Ulrichs)
 * 10) coverage in major standard indexes, inclding particularly Scopus and Web of Science (Science Citation Index)
 * 11) latest year's impact factor if available, and rank in the JCR subject field(s). Include the year so it can be updated.
 * 12) any actual references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.
 * 13) a list of the 3 or 4 most influential articles similarly, getting citation figures from Web of Science.
 * 14) External links to the journal's main web site, and, if relevant, the main website of the sponsoring body.

It should not contain
 * 1) General information listing all the fields covered, unless it is not obvious from the title
 * 2) Statements of praise for the journal -- see WP:PEACOCK
 * 3) A list of those on the editorial board
 * 4) names of the staff, except editors in chief; subordinate or section editors should not usually be listed.
 * 5) Information about subscription prices
 * 6) Information about how to submit articles
 * 7) Links to the publisher's general website, or to subpages within the journal's site.
 * and, most important, it must contain no text, especially not the description of fields covered, from the web page description of the journal. That is a copyright violation, and needs to be rewritten. Even if you are prepared to donate copyright according to WP:DCM, it is likely to be unsuitably promotional.

Please read also our  WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. As it specifies there, the best way to start is by using   the infobox journal template; but also convert the information there  to prose.  DGG ( talk ) 13:32, 4 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I was about to give the same advice as Crusio. It would save everyone (including you) lots of headaches if you read WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. It has excellent guidelines on how to write articles on academic journals. Since you edit seems to focus on Bentham Science Publishers, you might also want to take a look at our advices on conflicts of interest and how do be productive, despite a conflict of interest. Otherwise, you might very well end up blocked from editing. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

"Unofficial impact factors"
In case you didn't notice this yet, I'm trying to help you here. Inserting these SCImago "unofficial impact factors" is not very useful and only make the articles look like you are trying to "pad" them. They will make it more likely, not less, that someone will come around and challenge them. Just listing that they are included in respected selective databases (not DOAJ or Google Scholar, for example) will show that these journals are sufficiently notable for inclusion. padding the articles will make your work look promotional and people will try to delete it as spam. Hope this clarifies and explains. Please revert your last few edits re-adding this stuff. --Crusio (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I see you continue adding this stuff. Are you even reading these messages? The least you could do is respond. --Crusio (talk) 15:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Open Clinical Biochemistry Journal


The article The Open Clinical Biochemistry Journal has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases (except for a brief period in Scopus: 2009-2014), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Open Hematology Journal


The article The Open Hematology Journal has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:54, 15 September 2023 (UTC)