User talk:U0820540/sandbox

Feedback on potential topics
These both look like good candidates for improvement. Kobayashi Motofumi's article in particular is very thin, so it would be great if you could add more detail. Adding some information about his popularity in South Korea would be valuable too.

I noticed you chose two topics from my list of articles immediately related to course material. This is not a problem, but note also that you are allowed to work on *any* article related to Japanese or Korean pop culture--Godzilla, for example. Just wanted to make that clear. Ctextor at uofu (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Feedback on Project Proposal
You've compiled a really solid list of sources for improving these articles. What you'll want to do from now is to keep narrowing the topic, thinking about specific content you want to add to these articles. You list a lot of ideas for information that could be added, and if you can get to it all that's great! But that may end up being an enormous project, so feel free to focus on one or two aspects of each manga. Looking at the sources you've listed, it seems like you may be interested in questions of genre (these manga as examples of the military genre). So you may want to add a section that addresses their place within that genre (or the issue of anthropomorphism in Apocalypse Meow) as a way of synthesizing some of the information in your sources. Ctextor at uofu (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

kappanjoe's Peer Review
So far it seems like you've done a great job of finding resources that have valuable and relevant information in them. Since a lot of them seem to be of an analytical nature, (and I'm sure you've thought of this already) but I would just suggest keeping in mind that what you contribute remains fact-based and not argumentative in approach. Anyway, considering that the current states of the different articles, it looks like a solid game plan. If you end up working on The Silent Service at all, I would maybe suggest trying to contribute some information about the Characters or Release of the manga as part of your work. Good luck!

Kappanjoe (talk) 19:31, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Reply
kappanjoe, Thank you the review. As you suggested, I am working on the Character and manga information for the The Silent Service as well. Thank for your review and Good luck with your articles!

U0820540 (talk) 11:54, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Leaney's review:)
I think you did a very good job in giving us a good background and description of the characters. I hope you don't mind, but I went through and made some minor changes to grammar in the article. I would suggest adding a bit more explanation about what "realism" is so that someone who did not read the manga could understand what you are referring to. Good job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dianaleaney (talk • contribs) 02:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Reply
Leaney, Thank you the review and I don't mind that you changed the my grammar errors. I actually should thank you for finding my errors and fixed it. I really appreciate your review. Good luck with your articles!

U0820540 (talk) 03:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

CT Feedback
This is looking like a good start. The most important thing for you to do right now is to document what you've written by citing sources, especially in the Response section. Who is saying this? Remember that you cannot do your own analysis for a Wikipedia article--whatever you say has to be already said in a reliable source. This material could be appropriate for your final paper, though.

Also, perhaps you can think of a more descriptive title for the "Additional Facts" section. Perhaps "Style and Influence"? Ctextor at uofu (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)