User talk:U1012256/Yui Aragaki/Kenren01 Peer Review

U1012256's article:

Lead: I still think that it would be good to add a few more small things to the lead besides just the one, but maybe there is a lack of available information.

Structure: Outline, Early Life, and Career are all the main points and see nothing wrong with their structure.

Balance: Like before, the lead still seems strangely short in comparison to the rest of the article. Maybe a little more info would balance it out.

Neutrality: Stating facts it seems, but a lot of the sentences lack good citation. There is only two citations, more should be added.

Reliability: I think the length and information is good, it just needs more citations.

Wiki article:

Lead: The leading information seems to be good. It is short but effective I think. Maybe a few other small details could be added to the lead?

Structure: All aspects of the article have their own section. I see no problem,

Balance: Compared to other sections, the lead does seem too brief.

Neutrality: The article seems neutral, and mostly seems to just be reporting facts.

Reliability: Over 26 well based references. I see no problem here.