User talk:U193581/Archive 1

How is the sex abuse not relevant to the ELCA main info page, it was the largest per capita settlment in U.S. history; it made ABC, CNN, Fox News, and Yahoo's main stories, and even foreign papers. Current events become historical events ovet time, the fact that it is current does not diminish it's worthiness to be or be included in a wikipedia article. If there was, no articles on September 11 or the  occupation of Iraq would exist. There is also a precendent for including sex abuse in a main church article: the sex abuse scandals envolving the catholic church are included there. This was a story that got interlnational coverage; invloves a fact of natioanl scale, and is certainly an inmportant development in the history of the ELCA and is relevant to the artciel. The reference should be restored; perhaps as part of a more comprehensive history of the church; it should have never been deleted without discussion. --JCarriker 03:19, May 1, 2004 (UTC)

You are right, and I stand corrected. Edwin 20:58, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

You should not move articles without discussion --Gene s 08:15, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Please do not edit my User: page. Use Talk page if you want to leave comments. --Gene s 08:58, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

My apologies, I got a new Dvorak keyboard and wasn't paying close attention. Edwin 09:25, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Perhaps you will find this funny...
Don't Ask Don't Tell Micah 01:51, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

"THE" was used for the post 1960 ALC not the pre 1960 ALC you should not have moved it

http://www.elca.org/co/roots.html

See my response on your user talk page. Please also remember to sign comments you can do this by typing for tildes "~". Thanks again. Edwin 07:20, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)