User talk:UC1795/New Sandbox

Jeff comments
- You should build in specific references throughout.

- You imply that planting native species is a requirement on the same level as disposal of hazardous materials. I doubt that is the case - be careful not to overstate.

- Be careful about repeating yourself - you mention rehabilitation and site preparation in more than one place. Consider a reorganization so that it is all together.

- The last sentence of the "Development" section seems to belong better as part of the presentation in the next section. As it is, it is devoid of context.

- "the benefits provided by rehabilitating a landfill for its conversion into a solar landfill outweigh any negative effects posed by the existence of a solar farm." That is a BOLD statement. Do you have a reference? I suspect that the issue is more nuanced, and you should express more caution.

- The last paragraph lacks a focus. Bacteria and fungi? What do you mean by "ecological dynamics"?

Overall, I think this would benefit from a reorganization to focus your point. I'd also like to see more connection to biodiversity and conservation. One potential avenue is to review what is known about the impacts (+ or -) of solar farms - whether on landfills or not - on wildlife. Evidence that they can house biodiversity off of landfills can be referred to, perhaps.

Consider more academic literature, too. I see you added 3 sources, but they aren't in the text and besides could be more authoritative. Jeffcorbin518 (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)