User talk:UCNM

February 2015
Hello, I'm Cmr08. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Nusenda Credit Union without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Cmr08 (talk) 00:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

We are learning about Wikipedia as we go. Thanks for the help. I am deleting an article ref written by a local rag. The Ref is being added by the "journalist" of said rag that wrote the article. They are on an agenda against our organization because we are not advertising with their rag. Sorry for the hiccups.
 * I added the reference in question, and I am not the journalist who wrote the article. I've never even been to New Mexico, and I do not have an agenda against your organization. As per WP:V we should cite reliable sources in articles to verify the claims made in them. Everymorning   talk  00:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Please stop making untrue accusations against other editors in edit summarys, as you did here. The editor has made it clear above that he has no connection with the reference article and even provided a better source after you complained and made accusations about the first reference added, yet you come back and again with similar comments about the editor over the new source. Articles on Wikipedia need to be sourced and the editor in question is only trying to do that, yet you keep removing the references section and the uncategorized tag. Cmr08 (talk) 22:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

They are not untrue accusations. I've researched it thoroughly. You are being misled. I am willing to speak about this with you in person over the phone if you would like. Kennedy - 505-998-2725


 * The editor you are making accusations about added a source to an unsourced article. In an edit summary, you accused that editor of adding a "derogatory reference from news agency - article author." The editor left you a message explaining no connection, and attempted to source the now unsourced article again by adding a different reference. You removed that reference also and left an edit summary claiming "non-applicable reference placed by an agent of the referred page. Spam or needlessly derogatory information." You have thus accused the same editor of being connected with two different sources. That's a bit of a stretch, thinking an experienced editor who has edited many different articles over the years is only here to attack your article. It doesn't matter if you like it or not, articles must have sources, and telling me here that you researched the content thoroughly is great, but that's not sourcing, they have to actually go in the article. I have informed the editor in question, User:Everymorning about the accusations. Cmr08 (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)