User talk:UOOtheheavenforwhitekiwis

September 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Colleges of the University of Otago, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯  talk  08:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Colleges of the University of Otago. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯  talk  08:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * is right you need to read the links above and familiarise yourself with the tone of the encyclopedia. Your first edit reads like something from a gossip blog and is completely unacceptable. And if you threaten someone here again you will be blocked. Slow down and take your time. Glen (talk) 09:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

WHO THE HELL DID I THREATEN? JUST SAYING YOU ARE ALL USELESS IE SPREADING PEOPLE


 * I am talking about the "I want you to be held responsible!" and ALL CAPS rants on Nkon21's talk page. I thought that would've been obvious.Glen (talk) 10:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

What obvious is you are annoyed with the truth and try to block it. Also give me details exactly who and how did I threaten in that message. DETAILS?!!!! When you make a huge claim like that it needs to be specific. You exactly sound like a white person when they don't like a black person making a claim! and they just call the cops to get help from what is made to protect them. DETAILS DETAILS and you yourself need to be held responsible for your claims too. Have you blocked me already or should I ask more times?


 * You don't need to post everything twice I can see it here. We try to keep conversations intact so posting everything in two places isn't necessary. I was specific my post above. This is my final post on the matter. I strongly recommend you start contributing positively or you'll likely be blocked as not here to build an encyclopedia, Glen (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

I make you sure the fact that you do not answer the Questions tell a a lot about the Wikipedia!

Which part of letting people know facts is not encyclopedic?!

And I asked many times to be blocked and I said it would be an honor.

Answers are different than running from the truth and running to telling anything you want and threatening me to be blocked multiple times while I simply am asking to put the fact in a page that a place is closed!!!!!!

You really need to change your ideas of truth and lies. you sound like you guys are besties with Donald Trump.

Where exactly did I threaten anyone with anything? Answers?!!!!!?!!!?

Also why everyone is on defense here trying to accuse people of doing disruptions?!!!!

The tone can be way more polite and saying the information on Wikipedia is supposed to just inform and not telling news is more than enough in many case.

Why should you guys go on defense and offense over and over just for an edit?!

You assume people on here to Disrupt your precious lies?!!

Again I say letting people know that the head of the college is Luke is a lie https://www.otago.ac.nz/aquinas/people/index.html he is a very nice lad and is working in The Aquinas college. Your Website made me contact him about Abbey College! the lovely Yulia Taylor is responsible for the place now, and not letting people know that Abbey is closed is keeping them from facts.

Keep the misinformation up and live your little lies.

Who can I contact about you and your bestie's behaviour and asking for the truth to be on Wikipedia?

And please keep in mind no one wants to have "Disruptive behaviour" unless you push them hard and start threatening them right aways over and over.


 * Dispute resolution. Glen (talk) 10:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Changing an incorrect fact on Wikipedia is fine, especially if you can cite your changes (see WP:CITE). For clarity that is not what the messages you received above were about. They were about the tone of the other content you added, eg Statements like those are not written in the tone of an encyclopedia, which is why you were reverted. Feel free to make the factual changes you see fit, and please read the citation guideline. Thanks. Glen (talk) 11:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello again,

Thank you for the clarification. I learned from my first edit, made a second edit that simply said the place will be closed on November. I submitted a second edit to the page that when it was immediately rejected I felt like there must be a bias about people who try to make changes on any page on here.

When you stop people, policing them and using very strong words, they over react.Simply check the record of your colleague and see how many people are upset about her telling them that they are being disruptive and she/he uses very strong language and like you very fast goes towards threatening to block people.

Make it a habit to answer questions and be responsive:

And again I insist you answer about Threatening! Who and how I threatened and how if it is the case make a case i will send it to my lawyer and we will discuss false accusations against me. I can either go against you and/or your friend and/or against Wikipedia. We also can get to an agreement that I had no intention on threatening anyone.

Who can I contact about you and your bestie's behaviour and asking for the truth to be on Wikipedia?

Answers ?


 * And I already answered you here. See WP:DR Glen (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

And, And again I insist you answer about Threatening! Who and how I threatened and how if it is the case make a case i will send it to my lawyer and we will discuss false accusations against me. I can either go against you and/or your friend and/or against Wikipedia. We also can get to an agreement that I had no intention on threatening anyone.?


 * And I have already answered that as well above (twice in fact). Listen, I'm done speaking to you. I've given you advice, tried to assume good faith and now you have just made legal threats (see WP:NLT). Take your dispute to the resolution boards (that I have also linked to twice now). Do not post to my talk page and I'll do the same. Enough is enough. Glen (talk) 12:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

What kind of a kid your are?!! Do not tell the truth or I will block you?!!?!?!!?!?!?!?

Enough is surely more than enough! So you threaten people, and make them the problem while what they want to do is just simply make an edit.

Congratulations. Well done.

You can not even say that you were wrong and I did not threaten anyone. I just asked them to be kept responsible for their very aggressive way of denying changes to your precious pages. Are you unable to say that you were wrong?! Why?! Are you racist?! You assume I am colored?!