User talk:URFG

AfD nomination of More to Me Than Meat and Eyes
I have nominated More to Me Than Meat and Eyes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/More to Me Than Meat and Eyes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:11, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello URFG! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Toby Wright -
 * 2) Scott Humphrey -
 * 3) Sterling Winfield -

Proposed deletion of Bored to Tears


The article Bored to Tears has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kalen Chase


The article Kalen Chase has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears not to be notable outside of a band that never really made it off the ground and is notable only for certain people involved in it aside from Chase."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  danny music editor  oops 16:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Kalen Chase for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalen Chase is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kalen Chase until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  danny music editor  oops 18:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)