User talk:URunICon

WP:POINT
Your recent edits appear to be trying to make some kind of WP:POINT. I'd strongly advise against behaving like this as it usually doesn't end well. Cheers, Number   5  7  20:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Stop trying to own articles about elections and use correct tables, as in templates that have been created just for the purpose of creating election tables. Don't use tables of your own creation that are both ugly and less informative than the standard ones. --URunICon (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Results tables
Having slept on our dispute, I was going to offer an olive branch and another attempt at compromise, so, it's incredibly disappointing to see that you've decided to plough on regardless of a lack of consensus. However, in the spirit of Wikipedian co-operation, how about using the format of the table at Finnish parliamentary election, 2015 as a compromise? Number  5  7  12:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Isn't that format the one I've tried to use all along? It's not perfect; it lacks the color codes, but it's good enough. --URunICon (talk) 12:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't have a problem with the colour codes being added to it. Glad we can finally put this to bed. Number   5  7  12:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

IIHF
Ok, did not saw that while being on phone. Thanks. Kante4 (talk) 15:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Finns party
Hi! I'm User:Jeff6045. Firstly I want to thank for your input. However, I want you to notice that there are various political views about finns party. We can't just remove far-right position because other sources reject far-right position on Finns party. We have to show other users there are various political views and let them consider the party's political position. In addition ultranationalism doese not refer to fascism. Such as Vox (political party), Greek Solution or Liberal Democratic Party (Japan) are considered to have ultranationalism in their ideology but none of them are considered to be fascistic. Lastly, if you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions you can leave me a message on my talk page. I'm always welcome to your opinion. Thank you. Jeff6045 14:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Luettelo Suomen pääministereistä
Mitä pelleilyä on tehty artikkelissa luettelo Suomen pääministereistä? Parannettua taulukkoa on sabotoitu niin, että vaalit on merkitty niitä seuranneiden hallitusten jälkeen, vaikka pitäisi olla edellä. Lisäksi on huomioitava, että eduskuntavaalien 1922, 1927, 1930, 1933, 1936, 1939 ja 1951 jälkeen hallitukset eivät jättäneet eronpyyntöään. Vuosikymmeniin on palautettu vuosisataa tarkoittava 2000-luku, kun pitää olla vuosikymmentä tarkoittava 2000-luvun ensikymmen.

Osioon Tiedot numeroina on palautettu virheelliset pääministeripäivät. Artikkelissa Suomen valtioneuvosto lukee: "Huom! Valtioneuvoston luettelon maininta hallituspäivistä ilmoittaa, kuinka monena päivänä hallitus on toiminut, jolloin hallituksen vaihdospäivä lasketaan mukaan sekä edellisen hallituksen että uuden hallituksen toimikauteen. Valtioneuvoston luettelo ei siis kerro kuinka monta päivää eli ei kestoaikaa toisin kuin Wikipedian luettelo."

Kun siis Kiviniemen hallitus nimitettiin ''22. kesäkuuta 2010 ja sai eron 22. kesäkuuta 2011, niin hallitus oli toimessa 365 vrk ja siis Mari Kiviniemi pääministerinä 365'' vrk, ei 366 (vuosi 2011 ei ollu karkausvuosikaan). Vastaavasti kaksinkertaiselle pääministerille Matti Vanhaselle on palautettu vrk:iksi 2 556, vaikka oikea määrä on 2 554, nelinkertaiselle pääministerille Kalevi Sorsalle on palautettu 3 652, vaikka on 3 648 vrk jne. jne.abr>Sanna Marinin vrk-laskurissa on aikamallineena, vaikka pitää olla   

--Ergo eht Gogam (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)