User talk:US-Snuffy

October 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 19:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Unconstructive and or disruptive is a matter of opinion. As your edits appear to be in my opinion unconstructive and disruptive they will be reverted. You most certainly do not hold a monopoly regarding what people may find informative on Wikapedia. US-Snuffy (talk) 19:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)


 * But it is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of policy. You may have missed the links to the relevant policies as they were included in an edit summary; I repeat them here: WP:RS/IMDB and Manual_of_Style/Film. Cheers! Captainllama (talk) 01:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I do not like nor accept the egoistical tone of the original message sent to me. I read and understood first time the links you mention, but thanks anyway for the heads-up. I have removed the "offending" link to avoid further vandalizing of other folks efforts, and reinstated the text which is accurate, and easily confirmed by picking a name and doing a simple google search.
 * Take care. US-Snuffy (talk) 08:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 10:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)