User talk:USATA

June 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saint Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Nina Agdal. Thank you. Blue Edits (talk) 15:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John de Jongh, you may be blocked from editing. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John de Jongh. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

USATA, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Ok thank you for offer. USATA (talk) 20:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Your recent editing history at United States Virgin Islands shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ibadibam (talk) 03:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)