User talk:USERNAME~enwiki/Archives/Archive 2

That was quick :-)
Thanks Xavexgoem (talk) 12:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

LF Help ^^
User:ECWAGuru keeps blanking his talk page after he gets warned under what reason should I give him a Warning ?


 * According to guidelines, we have to assume the user is acting in good faith. Hence, it is considered that the user has read the warnings. You do not need to warn him. Chenzw    Talk   13:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: reverting vandalism
Hehe :) No problem. De728631 (talk) 19:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC) i just thought it would enlighten mr T's page a bit lol :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Countcrackyoula (talk • contribs)

AIV (and Huggle?)
Hi, please take into consideration that User:157.203.42.50 was not a customer for AIV, this is a content dispute that should not be handled by automated tools such as huggle. If you weren't using an automated tool, please keep in mind that AIV is only for outright vandalism. Thanks! -- lucasbfr  talk 12:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
Roman A

In the discussion the article is clearly marked - "A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article."

Which means that large changes can be made to the feature article without previous discussion. That is what I did, in an attempt to remove libeous and unproven claims.

What is the response? You revert and accuse me of Vandalism, and then prompt a ban.

I believe your actions fall under the heading of "Administrator Abuse" on the Adminstrators guidelines page

Your "warning" and reversion are unwarranted and not inline with the beliefs of open source or Wiki

I have entered a point on the talk page bring the attention to your actions in hope that someone else will support the correct and needed changes I made which you reverted.

UK Ecomony

Again there was discussion in the Talk section - I acted on it and you claim it is vandalism and revert....

ok as noted by both users I apologise about this event and I will ask a admin to remove all warnings which were given. I gave the warning to the Ip address because I thought he was removing content. Alexnia (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem :) My first instinct was "omg content removal", but then I saw this was a bit more complicated, hence my message. When using Huggle, always double check before sending a report to AIV, we often act very fast on these reports and friendly fire can happen very easily. -- lucasbfr  talk 13:28, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I will assume the Huggle/AIV part was intended for Alexnia since I have never used either. Note the problem still does not have any resolution since Alexnia has not commented at all, and therefor it has to be assumed he would still ban me for making the necessary changes

ouch seems like a have two apologise about two articles this dosn't look like a good day for me ;( The reason I reported you on that article was because you removed information. Alexnia (talk) 13:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * So what does that mean in terms of the edits? Does that mean you reversed the revert? Does that mean that the corrections we spent time making have been put in? Does that mean you will not be banning us for trying to improve Wiki?

From my perspective its me that is not having the good day, since it was my time that got wasted not yours - sometimes content removal is a good thing you know —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.35.101.76 (talk) 13:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

I already reported this incident to the admins and I'm waiting for a response for removal of the warning I also want to notice that I have also wasted  my time  trying  to solve  this  problem what  do want anyway and forgodsake sign your comments. Alexnia (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

I would also like you too have a look to this page to show you I reported it to the admins   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Roman_Abramovich_Misunderstoodment_by_User:Alexnia Alexnia (talk) 14:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * What do I want? I already stated that - I want clarification on where the changes and the freedom to edit stand.


 * You have not answered those questions. The way it appears now, if I tried to edit the page I would be banned or it would just be reverted. You have made no comment to the contray. So its not like I am making comments to cause you trouble - those are questions.


 * And wasted your time? You created the problem so your time is not a factor in this, sure it might have been a mistake but it was one that would be easy to avoid and since you did it twice in quick succession that has to be taken into consideration. I guess you think that just because some gave you admin rights that you should be able to mess someone around and they should not be irritated by it - well it does not work that way and your attempts to make a joke of it and brush it aside do not help. A sincere apology is fine and I really don't have a problem, but that of course does not help with clarification


 * I can not sign my comments because Wiki just erases it from this IP. But being as this is a Talk Page its not really needed anyway. Swearing at people and being disrespectful to them for not using signatures is not correct behavior.


 * Why post that link? Do you think I did not believe you to begin with? Do you think that page has meaning to me? I am not an admin and as such do not understand that process of banning or removing bans. I took your word for it from the start —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.35.101.76 (talk) 14:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)