User talk:US Referee

Welcome!
Hello, US Referee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to 2015 Real Monarchs season. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! &mdash;  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 07:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Sources for the referee assignments
Hi!

Where did you find the information about the referee assignments in the 2015 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup?

Thanks! Guilherme (talk) 11:33, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

WAC soccer standings
I had Seattle ahead of UNLV on win %age because Seattle=.722 & UNLV=.667--- The WAC agrees... GWFrog (talk) 03:49, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

The method for resolving standings order is found on page 16 of the 2015 WAC Media Guide: 2015 WAC Media Guide. I could not find a newer edition than 2015, but in my experience, these particular tiebreakers are used almost universally for soccer by NCAA conferences, and there is no reason to believe that the criteria have changed. Winning percentage plays no role in resolving standings order. To determine the order between Seattle and UNLV, the following steps apply:

Result: UNLV outranks Seattle.
 * Points: Seattle 18 (5*3 + 3*1), UNLV 18 (6*3). This primary criterion results in a two-way tie (no other WAC teams have exactly 18 points at this time), so the first step of tiebreaking procedure is used.
 * Head-to-head competition: UNLV defeated Seattle 2–1 in 2OT on 29 October. UNLV wins this tiebreaker.

You are correct that the WAC page currently lists Seattle above UNLV, but this is not relevant to the ultimate determination of standings order. These standings are published automatically by the WAC's content management system, whose criteria for ordering teams on the standings page are incorrect beyond the primary criterion of points. US Referee (talk) 04:28, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red
--Ipigott (talk) 10:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

WOSO Task Force News: April 2018
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

CSOC Team Season Article Template
Hey Referee,

I have begun a template to use for college men's soccer season articles. You can find it here, if you have any ideas to improve the article, be sure to leave a comment on the talk page. Thanks! Quidster4040 (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

WP:Football college soccer talk
There is currently a discussion going on in the WP:FOOTBALL talk page about the notability of college soccer tournaments. I feel like given your contributions to the game you might want to give your thoughts. Cobyan02069 (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

Women's Football / Soccer Update > October 2020
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)