User talk:UWP-Wiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Udo Pohl (September 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Udo Pohl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Udo_Pohl Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Utopes&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Udo_Pohl reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes (talk / cont) 06:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello Utopes, thanks for checking. I do not well understand why the draft of this page has not been accepted. The reason left is that it is not adequately supported by reliable sources and has no secondary sources.
 * Well, the draft tried to provide reliable and secondary references by the included links. The respective sites of the reputables journals list download numbers up to over 270.
 * The book chapters and also the monographs (text books) review existing research and are as such secondary sources. The first monograph (epitaxy edn 1+2) has presently 46k accesses and 84 citations according to publisher Springer, with edn 1 among Springer’s Top 50% downloaded eBooks in 2015 and 2017 (Bookmetrix). The second monograph (semiconductor physics) published with the distingiushed solar pioneer KW Böer has presently 212k accesses and 57 citations (Springer edn1; edition 2  published in 2023 has 35k accesses by now). These public figures indicate broad attentions by the scientific community. All articles, monographs and book book chapters have of course been vetted by the scholarly community.
 * There are yet no links to the monograp sites of the publisher and the patents. Should these be included? 91.1.85.131 (talk) 09:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello Utopes,
 * Thanks for checking. I do not well understand why the draft of this page has not been accepted. The reason left is that it is not adequately supported by reliable sources and has no secondary sources.
 * Well, the draft actually provided reliable and secondary references by the included links. The respective sites of the reputables journals list download numbers up to over 270.
 * The book chapters and also the monographs (text books) review existing research and are as such secondary sources. The first monograph (epitaxy edn 1+2) has presently 46k accesses and 84 citations according to publisher Springer, with edn 1 among Springer’s Top 50% downloaded eBooks in 2015 and 2017 (Bookmetrix). The second monograph (semiconductor physics) published with the distingiushed solar pioneer KW Böer has presently 212k accesses and 57 citations (Springer edn1; edition 2  published in 2023 has 35k accesses by now).
 * These public figures indicate broad attentions by the scientific community. All articles, monographs and book book chapters have of course been vetted by the scholarly community.
 * Best regards, UWP-Wiki (talk) 12:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Udo Pohl. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Nonovix (talk) 15:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Curie (January 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Curie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Daniel_Curie Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lopifalko&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Daniel_Curie reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Curie (January 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Curie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Daniel_Curie Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ldm1954&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Daniel_Curie reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 08:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Udo Pohl
Hello, UWP-Wiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Udo Pohl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Curie
Hello, UWP-Wiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Curie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)