User talk:UYBS

3rr warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Chronic fatigue syndrome. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Signing
Hi UYBS, just a quick note to let you know the 4 tildies don't work for signing in edit summaries. Only sign after your comments on discussion pages. Ward20 (talk) 20:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Alternative_names_for_chronic_fatigue_syndrome. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are currently at 3 reverts within 24 hours for this article. sciencewatcher (talk) 00:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Your edit on my talk page
Are you on the right page? my last edit to your talk page was on 9 June 2010 on the topic signing. Ward20 (talk) 01:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Based on the history of this talk page, and the "there is no Lord" comment at the end of the section on yours, that was obviously meant for WLU, not you. —RobinHood70 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah, now I see the deleted section, Thanks. Ward20 (talk) 12:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that per the talk page guidelines deleting a comment is taken as an indication that it has been read (see the final bullet in WP:TPO).
 * Also, your general behaviour of stomping about like an angry mastadon gives every indication that you will eventually face a short, then escalating series of blocks. Usually, this sort of behaviour, if not changed, ends up in a full ban.  If you want to be blocked, continue, but if you want to contribute you need to listen to what other editors have to say.  It all makes sense when you get it, but if you're determined to use wikipedia to promote just your perspective on CFS, it will end badly.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 14:47, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

No Personal Attacks
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
 * I realize that the various CFS articles can be frustrating to work on at times, especially with all the different points of view, but edit summaries that refer to other editors as "stupid" and "nutters" are likely to get you blocked if you continue. Just because people don't share your point of view doesn't mean that they're either of those things. —RobinHood70 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)