User talk:Uargueta/sandbox

Rebeca's Peer Review
What I like about your sandbox is of how detailed you evaluated the articles. You provided bullet points for every concern you had regarding the articles you chose. In the article selection you give a more concise explanation of what you plan to do with the articles. In regards to the scholarly sources, I liked how you go into great details to explain your sources, what they contribute to the articles, and why you chose them. I also through it was beneficial to include an “other possible source” even if this part is unfinished. The links that you gave for readers to look at webpages is a nice touch because it gives a more in-depth view of the two articles you chose and helps to further understand the surrounding issues. In your drafting it is great that you have begun to add to your plans, even if it’s a small section.

Input by Gabriella
It is clear that the research you have done in preparation of drafting will assist you in the contributions you said you hope to make to your Area and Sector articles. I even find it exciting that you have additional sources that you have yet to find a place for the information you have collected for them. Maybe that means that you can add more to the articles than you initially anticipated? The drafting you have started in your Sandbox is a bit difficult to read--but I understand that it is because you plan on continuing the draft. Nonetheless, I think it's a good start! Gabbyblandino (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC)gabbyblandino