User talk:Ubiquity/Archive 5

= Archive 1, created 6/23/2014 = = Archive 2, created 2/11/2015 = = Archive 3, created 2/24/2016 = = Archive 4, created 9/9/2016 = = Archive 5, created 5/1/2019 =

Backlog
The NPP backlog now stands at 13,158 total unreviewed pages.

Just to recap:
 * 13 July 2016: 7,000
 * 1 August 2016: 9,000
 * 7 August 2016: 10,472
 * 16 August 2016: 11,500
 * 28 August 2016: 13,158

You naturally  don't  have to feel obliged, but if there's anything you can do it would be most appreciated. I've spent 40 hours on it this week but it's only a drop in the ocean.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Apposing the Speedy deletion of Donnabella Mortel
I oppose the deletion Donnabella Mortel is a known working actress, former professional cheerleader, and has several dozen articles, interviews, etc. to reinforce her notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melissaburner (talk • contribs) 20:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, Melissa. It's not up for speedy deletion (it couldn't have been, because you asserted her significance). I proposed its deletion through a PROD tag, which you removed, as was your right. Now we're having a deletion discussion. For at least a week, people will be able to discuss Mortel's notability, and whether she deserves a Wikipedia page. You can participate in this too. If you want to do that, go to the discussion page and put in something like this:


 * Keep: I think Mortel is notable because...


 * Don't forget to sign your remarks with ~ . Although it's good to participate in the discussion, it would be even better if you could add some decent references to the article, to sources that show she's attracted critical attention. Having a handful of small parts in TV shows doesn't make her notable, nor does being a cheerleader, unless she got some press coverage for it. Please read the general notability guidelines to get a better idea of what you need. But it's not enough to prove she did the things you say she did, you have to prove that she received coverage in reliable, independent sources. ubiquity (talk) 20:41, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Rumor Town Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rumor Town Cover.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Clay Blaker
Hello! Your submission of Clay Blaker at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Halo weapons
So since according to WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE I can't make lists of weapons, I guess I can't really fix something that goes directly against that. Anyways sorry about that, I didn't even know the guideline existed... Gearzein (talk) 18:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Gearzein


 * I'm not sure what you have in mind, but yes, the policy seems pretty clear against lists of game weapons. If you look at the list of articles in WikiProject Halo, you won't find any lists of stuff, just people, characters, etc.


 * If you agree that the article contravenes policy, and want to delete it, just blank it, that will speed up the process. Or leave it alone if you want to see what happens. But I wouldn't work on it any more if I were you, it's pretty certain to be deleted eventually.


 * You don't need to be sorry, it was an honest mistake. It's tough being new, there's a lot to learn. Since you're interested in Halo, why not post a note on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Halo saying you want to help? Also, there's a to-do list on that page, listing possible things to help with.


 * Good luck, and welcome to Wikipedia! ubiquity (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

My page deleted?
it said my page was deleted because it was about a person but didn't state why they were of significance, which I did state the YouTube channel of the person. Jadestaples (talk) 16:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I assume you mean the page Jaedon Staples. It hasn't been deleted, I have nominated it for speedy deletion. Simply having a YouTube channel doesn't necessarily make a person significant, in the WIkipedia sense. Do you have any reliable, independent sources that mention the person? If you do, please add them to the article as soon as you can. ubiquity (talk) 17:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

well fair enough there, sorry for the mistake, if I can find any articles on him I will add them as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadestaples (talk • contribs)


 * OK. A couple of other points:
 * On your talk page, you admit the article is autobiographical. Please read WP:AUTOBIO to see why you should not be writing this article, and the special rules that apply if you decide to do so anyway.
 * You don't need to use the reply_to template to talk to me on my own page.
 * Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 17:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Škoda Rapid Six, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skoda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

IUGS deletion request
Hi Ubiquity, I've removed your deletion request, and added an external reference that explains notability. I explain on its talk page. Note that I have nothing to do with this institution, so I'm not shilling here, I'm simply familiar with higher education in Dominica so I know that IUGS has changed and adapted, and should remain. --Steve Foerster (talk) 14:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * OK. I'm not totally convinced, but I suppose it meets the letter of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, and the article isn't trying to hide anything. You might want to remove the school's name from List of unaccredited institutions of higher education, which is based on 2011 info. ubiquity (talk) 16:15, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. And thanks for the tip, I hadn't realised it was on that list. --Steve Foerster (talk) 17:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Djakhangir Agaragimov
Hello Ubiquity. You asked for citations and sources but unfortunately failed to adress which statement of the article needs to be sourced further. Could you please elaborate on which sentence or claim in the article appeared undersourced in your judgement? Thank you, --Gereon K. (talk) 16:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, K Gereon. Thanks for asking. There are certainly statements which don't seem to be supported by any source at all; I don't think you need me to tell you which ones they are. The one most in need of sourcing is "He is one of the few chess players who managed to become Grandmaster without holding the title International Master before."


 * But it's not so much that specific statements need further sourcing, but that the current sources are all pretty weak. The first is an article about someone else that only makes a brief mention of Agaragimov, the second is his GM application, which is a primary source (and which will not mean much to someone who is not a chess fan), and the third is, again, a page that mentions him without discussing him. So far, the article doesn't demonstrate significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. I'm not sure if grand masters are automatically considered notable, but there seems to be a lot of stuff written about the guy, so it would be better if the article had stronger references. I'm not suggesting that the article be deleted, but I reviewed it, and that was my review comment. ubiquity (talk) 17:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Dark Lakes, Independence Township, MI.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dark Lakes, Independence Township, MI.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

David Osper
Hi Ubiquity, I've removed your deltetion request for David Osper I've added external references that explains notability. I'm a fan of television shows like True Life, and he is the Executive Producer of the show I would hate to that go away. Thanks. --David Osper (talk) 14:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afay89 (talk • contribs)


 * Hi, Afay. I'm sorry, but I don't think the references that are there are sufficient. In any case, they were there (and I examined them) before I placed the initial deletion tag on the article. You were totally within your rights to remove that tag (basically, removing it just means you disagree with me), but now I have opened a formal deletion discussion on the article at Articles for deletion/David Osper. Feel free to join the discussion to explain your point of view.


 * I'm a little confused about your signature. It looks like you were actually trying to sign as David Osper. Are you saying you are David Osper? ubiquity (talk) 18:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK
Hello! Your submission of Alberto Pla y Rubio at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 12:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

How to put an article in drafts
Hi Ubiquity, Can you please tell me how to put an article in drafts and what will happen to that perticular article after adding it to drafts??? Thank you. CyberBrinda (comment) 2:57 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I think that now that someone has opened a formal deletion discussion about it, it's a little late for that. If you read my reply before you deleted it, you might remember that I warned of that possibility. At this point, I think the best you can do is add your comments to the discussion in Articles for deletion/Rashi Yadav. ubiquity (talk) 21:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Market Place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Emma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for notify me, I will definitely add references.--Hamody al-iraqi (talk) 19:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Please read the Wikipedia policies on verifiability to see what kinds of sources qualify as "reliable". I'm afraid the ones that are currently in the article don't qualify. ubiquity (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Akaki Tsilosani
Prof. Akaki Tsilosani is a prominent transplant surgeon, founder of TALIZI Clinic. He is recognized worldwide as one of the leading surgeons. Member and expert of International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery (ISHRS). There surely should be an article about A. Tsilosani in English Wikipedia too. (like turkish Doctor Koray Erdoğan for example). If an article needs some modification please let me know exactly what to do. I contribute to Wikipedia almost 10 years and I've read policies and want to modify this article so that it will be approved. Based on international recognition among colleagues and significant contribution to hair transplant surgery development, this article meets all Wikipedia criteria. I'm sure afer re editing and correction this article will be restored. Please advice exactly how to modify the article  Zetalion (talk)


 * The article on Akaki Tsilosani looked like a resume, which made it seem promotional, and it had no reliable sources, which confirmed it. If I had my way, the article on Koray Erdoğan would also be deleted for being promotional, but it has two things going for it: a couple of references to reliable sources (not all five references, but some), and he is the president of an organization that is notable on its own. If you resubmit the article on Tsilosani, my advice is to worry about solid sources before you worry about listing every last one of the subject's awards and conferences. ubiquity (talk) 18:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I appreciate your advice. Agree, maybe Koray Erdoğan's article is little bit promotional, but he is a prominent surgeon like A. Tsilosani. Their achievements are widely known among ISHRS, AAHRS and other international organizations. Ok, I'll remove everything which seems promotional and re-write the article with more solid sources. Zetalion (talk)

DYK nomination of Alberto Pla y Rubio
Hello! Your submission of Alberto Pla y Rubio at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Ubiquity, this is a final call for this nomination; the article still needs to be expanded significantly to qualify for DYK. Please let us know your plans within the week if you wish to pursue this nomination. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Don't think I can fill it out any more at this time. Sorry to have wasted your time, but thanks for reviewing it. ubiquity (talk) 01:48, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Clay Blaker
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I don't get it
So a page is "promotional" if it's anything other than a well established and well known publication? Why was Alfred Shortstaff and the Cavern of Time deleted? Please show me the rules that say exactly how popular you have to be as an author in order to have your work on Wikipedia. The page simply outlined a synopsis of the book, which to me is pretty neutral. I never said "This is a great book" or anything like it. Please enlighten me. Abelhawk (talk) 14:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a book-listing service, where anyone can post information about books they like. To have a Wikipedia article, a subject must be notable, and the notability must be verifiable. Please read Notability (books), particularly the section on "Criteria", to see what's required. Your article on ASatCoT supplied no references, but it did have a link to the official page (including an advertisement of free download) and to its Amazon page, and seemed to me to be designed only to let people know about the book and how they could obtain it, which is promotional. Your article was deleted by administrator who obviously agreed with my assessment. ubiquity (talk) 14:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Though I still don't see what could make a book "verifiably notable." If it's published, isn't that notable enough? Obviously other topics can have news articles about them, and I shouldn't have put a link to the official page, but I'm still not certain what allows one book to have a summary on Wikipedia and not another. Abelhawk (talk) 03:07, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The problem wasn't the summary, or the external link, but the lack of references. "verifiable notability" means "significant coverage in reliable, independent sources." For a book, this usually means awards or independent reviews (not random bloggers saying "i liked this book" but reviews with some editorial presence, such as in a newspaper). If a book is a best-seller, sales information could be used, though in that case reviews would probably also exist. If the book has a notable author (i.e., already in WIkipedia for other things), that can sometimes be taken as notability. Publication alone is not a sign of notability, as in this day anyone can publish a book (my own work appears in three books published by mainstream publishing companies, but none of them would make the cut for Wikipedia). ubiquity (talk) 09:23, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay, thanks for your reasonable response. Abelhawk (talk) 14:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

AramMir
Hi I'm the person made page for Chief AramMir he is director  and professional wrestler  at KWF  Wrestling in Thailand and Jordan. If you please help us to made reference for Chief AramMir  his website www.arammir.com there is report by kurdsat news TV in Kurdistan  thank you for support

David — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwfwrestling (talk • contribs)


 * That page appears to be a personal home page, so would not be considered a reliable reference. ubiquity (talk) 17:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tempora software, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Opposing deletion of Aan Baan Shaan Mera Hindustan
I have added youtube reference in which Saint Dr. Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Ji Insan talks about his new show 'Aan Baan Shaan Mera Hindustan' which he is going to launch soon. So, please do not delete this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndiaRuler (talk • contribs) 17:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I removed the tag in response to this. ubiquity (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndiaRuler (talk • contribs) 18:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Opposing deletion of Honeypreet Insan
I have added valid IMDB reference for Honeypreet Insan. So, please do not delete this page now — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndiaRuler (talk • contribs) 18:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * IMDB is not considered a reliable reference because people can self-publish there, but I will remove the tag, if you haven't already done so. I may still ask for a deletion discussion, because she does not seem very notable. ubiquity (talk) 18:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I have added her pic from bollywood movie 'MSG: The Warrior Lion Heart' in which she is an actress and Film-Director too. This can be further verified on the movie wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndiaRuler (talk • contribs) 18:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Resurrect Deleted Page
Hello, I want to ask if it's possible to resurrect the deleted Mystic Messenger page? Since the game's been out for a long time I guess there's a lot to write and cites, and it's popular enough to get many contributions.

Thank you.

--Yukinotane (talk) 00:57, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Whoa, someone made it already, apparently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yukinotane (talk • contribs) 00:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)


 * It looks pretty bad. If there are really a lot of cites, you should probably add some sources before someone moves for it to be deleted again. ubiquity (talk) 01:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter
Hello ,


 * Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action. If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
 * Second set of eyes

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation. Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
 * Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

Article
Thank you for the advise and direction. I am trying to contact you but Wikipedia communication seems complicated, hence this is the only way I could think of.

Question-- Do you have any sources that support the facts of the article, such as her being the daughter of Hira Devi Waiba, or any source demonstrating notability? Answer-- Yes, the links are of Nepal's leading national newspapers and most popular and widely visited websites and social media pages.

Yes I have added links which demonstrate the authenticity of the article. Unfortunately most are in Nepali hence you might not be able to read.

I will try and clean up the page more and develop it. Yes, I am her son but here my role is only of a Wikipedia contributor. In this case, I cannot help it if Hira Devi Waiba was my Mother.

I hope that explains. Kindly advise if more input needed.

Kindest Regards. Satya adt (talk) 19:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I removed the tags on the article. The references appear to be sufficient. ubiquity (talk) 19:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks for doing so.

Regards, Satya adt (talk) 20:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Superstition Meadery speedy delete
Hi Ubiquity,

I was told I'm not clearly stating why this article should deserve an Encyclopedia entry. I'd like some more time to work on this and this company has one of their brews listed as a top 25 of 2016. It's one of the top cider house and meadery's for quality in the world. I thought those two reason alone would warrant a page. Is there a section where I'm supposed to list reasons?? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstition_Meadery Justindevine (talk) 10:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC) [User:Justindevine|Justindevine]] (talk) 10:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

All the best, Justin Devine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justindevine (talk • contribs) 10:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * To recap: In January, you created an article on this subject, which I tagged for speedy deletion, and which was deleted by an administrator (not me) because it did not "credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject." You tried again this month, and someone else nominated it for deletion. I haven't participated in the current discussion. My opinion is that it certainly was promotional when it was nominated for deletion, but that the additional references you added may do the trick, particularly the ones showing Superstition has been noticed by notable journals and web sites. I believe you have also made clear the significance of the subject. So the article will probably survive. However, you have been remiss in not declaring your conflict of interest as a person who works for Superstition. Please read the Wikipedia policies on conflict of interest and take appropriate action.


 * The article has been edited by both you and . Is this also you? If so, please read the Wikipedia policy on user names, particularly the section on using multiple accounts. If it is not you, but a relative also involved with Superstition, what I said about conflicts of interest goes for them too. ubiquity (talk) 14:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

I've added a comment on the Talk for the Wikipedia: Superstition Meadery which I believe satisfies disclosing my potential conflict of interest. If it is not adequate, please let me know. As far as the username: devinejp, that is me and I didn't realize I had two different Wikipedia accounts. I've allowed my computer to automatically log me in, apparently I had a saved password connected to another account. I much prefer: Justindevine, and will add this disclosure to the Talk section as well. Thank you Ubiquity for all your help so far. Justindevine (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Very good. I added a keep vote to the deletion discussion. If you intend to continue creating content, you should look into deleting the account you don't want, as having two accounts can make people think you're engaging in sock puppetry even if you're not. ubiquity (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

ubiquity Thank you for all the feedback and help. I looked into deleting the username devinejp, it appears Wikipedia is not allowing this at this time. However, I figured out that if I used Firefox or Safari I was automatically logged into one or the other respectfully. I'll be careful to only use this one. Thank you so much for the 'Keep' vote. All the best Justindevine (talk) 03:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined CSD
Hi, Ubiquity. Thanks for your work on patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for Harnett County Library System, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Public library systems of cities are often notable; the article was not particularly promotional. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! Appable (talk) 18:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

New Page Review - newsletter #2
Hello ,


 * Please help reduce the New Page backlog 

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.


 * Getting the tools we need

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
 * Improve the tools: Vote here.
 * Reduce your review load: Vote here

New Page Review - newsletter No.2
Hello , We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to. Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten. This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody,  and
 * A HUGE backlog
 * Second set of eyes
 * Abuse
 * 1) this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting  in  a community ban.
 * 2) this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in  a community ban.
 * 3) This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

TAC Security
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Techsavyian (talk) 19:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC) It's one of the prominent and largest cyber security company in India.

References: https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/startups/chandigarh-cyber-security-startup-tac-security-bets-big-on-us-opportunities/61161853 http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/cyber-security-firm-tac-security-appoints-former-ibm-vp-william-may-to-its-board/article9704219.ece https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/startups/govt-has-to-come-up-with-policy-for-cyber-security-startups-tac-securitys-arora/58381521 http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/tac-security-appoints-lawrence-ang-as-board-member/article9584894.ece https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/people/impervas-lawrence-ang-joins-tac-security-board/57632619 https://thetechportal.com/2017/05/18/tac-security-appoints-willam-may-board/ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/software/with-digitisation-secure-it-infrastructure-critical-for-india-inc-tac-security/articleshow/56067225.cms http://www.dqindia.com/with-digitization-having-a-secure-it-infrastructure-is-critical-tac-security/ http://www.livemint.com/Companies/QU5HoaCUKzwpBvPYq7J5kK/TAC-Security-raises-PreSeries-A-finding-from-Vijay-Kedia.html http://bwdisrupt.businessworld.in/article/TAC-Security-Closes-Pre-Series-A-Funding-from-Prominent-Business-Investor-Vijay-Kedia/22-08-2016-104671/ https://inc42.com/flash-feed/tac-vijay-kedia/ http://www.forbesindia.com/article/startups/school-dropout-becomes-much-sought-after-cyber-security-expert/46005/1 https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/technology/for-digital-economy-govt-emphasizes-on-the-need-for-cyber-security-tac-securitys-trishneet-arora/56329611 http://www.financialexpress.com/industry/banking-finance/trishneet-aroras-start-up-tac-security-closes-its-pre-series-a-funding/452962/ https://e27.co/startup/tac-security-solutions http://www.voicendata.com/e-payments-frauds-step-up-demand-for-cyber-security-tac-securitys-trishneet-arora/ http://www.firstpost.com/tech/news-analysis/tac-security-receives-50-cases-of-hacking-in-one-month-after-demonetisation-3694903.html https://cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/digital-security/over-50-hacking-incidents-in-a-month-post-demonetisation-tac-security/56202469 http://techcircle.vccircle.com/2016/08/23/cybersecurity-startup-tac-security-gets-pre-series-a-funding/ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/cyber-experts-working-round-the-clock-to-protect-india-from-the-biggest-ransomware-attack/articleshow/58674741.cms http://www.forbesindia.com/article/real-issue/cyber-theat-enemy-at-the-gates/47671/1 http://www.dqindia.com/with-digitization-having-a-secure-it-infrastructure-is-critical-tac-security/ http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/subinder-khurana-ex-vice-president-of-cognizant-provides-backing-to-cyber-security-cmpany-tac-116080200850_1.html


 * This deletion was more than a year ago, but I see that it was because the article seemed promotional. If the company is as notable as you say, I'm sure it would be possible to write a non-promotional article about it. But I notice that you have tried this a couple of times and have been shot down (by people other than me) for promotionalism, copying, and having an external relationship with the company. You msy need to wait until a less-involved and more experienced editor takes an interest. ubiquity (talk) 04:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

I have recently joined back the Wikipedia and saw the page has been deleted. I request you to look into the page once again and if you want I can collect new references. Techsavyian (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Bianca Bagnarelli
Hi ubiquity! Translations can be requested at it:Wikipedia:Richieste di traduzione. However, please note that generally notability test is more restrictive on Italian Wikipedia than on English Wikipedia, so it may well be that it considered non-notable there even if there is an article here. --Jaqen (talk) 09:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

New Page Review Newsletter No.10
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! ACTRIAL:
 * ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing
 * Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking  place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
 * While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:
 * WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags
 * Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:
 * A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons
 * There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy
 * Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English News Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
 * Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
 * The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive! Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
 * Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: NPPbarnstar SE.png. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: RR3217-0014 100 rubles USSR 1989 Gold avers.png, Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-1991-CHF-250-reverse.png, Coin of Kazakhstan 500Thinker averse.png, US-$1000-SC-1878-FR-346a-PROOF.jpg.
 * Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
 * June backlog drive


 * New technology, new rules
 * New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
 * Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
 * Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.


 * Editathons
 * Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The Signpost
 * The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
 * Backlog


 * Community Wishlist Proposal
 * There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
 * Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!


 * Project updates
 * ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
 * There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.


 * New scripts
 * User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing copyvio-revdel on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello ,
 * Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
 * Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.


 * If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.


 * We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.


 * With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello ,

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
 * Reviewer of the Year
 * Thanks are also extended for their work to (15,059 reviews),  (12,760reviews),  (9,001reviews),  (8,440reviews),  (8,092reviews),   (5,306reviews),  (4,153 reviews),  (4,016reviews),  and  (3,615reviews)., , , and  have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while , with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top100 reviewers.

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
 * Less good news, and an appeal for some help

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
 * Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Training video

Alan knight
Why did you change the bit that I made that Is true Thebuzzpomleyfan (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Then all you have to do is add a citation showing which reputable source the information came from. ubiquity (talk) 20:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tom Pedi
Hello, Ubiquity,

Thanks for creating Tom Pedi! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Still working on it. References are sparse but I do have some. ubiquity (talk) 20:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm ZLEA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kanodar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ZLEA Talk \ Contribs 21:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Edits to Vermont counties
Some of the recent changes I've been making are to reflect the fact that county seats are legally titled "shire towns" in the state of Vermont. 216.66.124.26 (talk) 20:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)


 * OK, I'll accept that, and remove the vandalism notices. If you had put that in the edit description, I would not have reverted. In all honesty, though, I can't see that it adds much to the article to call them that unless the term is specifically used INSTEAD of county seat. ubiquity (talk) 20:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Jane Doe-response
We have established a page for Jane Doe in light of her appearance in Gotham and some of that information removed was placed there. I'm just letting you know that. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks. ubiquity (talk) 16:08, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do about it. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17


Hello ,


 * News
 * The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.


 * Discussions of interest
 * Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
 * db-blankdraft was merged into G13 (Discussion)
 * A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
 * There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.


 * Reminders
 * NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD  because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.


 * NPP Tools Report
 * Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
 * copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
 * The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

On my CSUC edit.
Earlier, you had wondered on your edit summary about why I put a section sign at the top of the article. This was due to an error on my part when I mis-clicked trying to revert vandalism on the page. I will be more careful next time. Have a nice day, Zanygenius(talk to me!)(email me!) 22:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * We all make mistakes, particularly me. Thanks for explaining. ubiquity (talk) 09:55, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Noam Gershov article and users
Hi Ubiquity, Just FYI, I do not trust any of those users editing that article not to all be the same person, so I have opened up a SPI case to ask a checkuser to confirm. Agent00x (talk) 17:54, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Fine with me, though I think you'll find they're just students trying to have some fun. There are students at almost every school who think it would be cool or funny or both to have their own name listed on the page. Let me know how it goes. ubiquity (talk) 17:57, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Ubiquity, just FYI they have been blocked either as meat or sockpuppets. Agent00x (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 07:12, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Peoria Intl Airport deletion
Hello and good day. In accidents and incidents section,you deleted the extra addition to 10/21/1971 incident. The disambiguation is wrong, that refers to the airline that existed from 1933-1953. Click on reference #15, go to Aviation Safety Report, click Chicago & Southern Airlines, was an airline that existed from 1969-1971. Yes it is an important addition, 2 airlines with similar names but two different airlines entirely. Is constructive, you will see that I am correct. I tried to highlight Delta C&S as my last edit. That was my original addition, He sourced with Aviation Safety Report. Hopefully you will reconsider, have a great day.2601:581:8000:21B0:A17E:1E4E:5CA:FFED (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Ah, OK. I assumed it was vandalism because === xxx === is a section breaker, and there's no reason to put it in the middle of a paragraph. I guess you meant &apos;&apos;xxx&apos;&apos; (italics) or &apos;&apos;&apos;xxx&apos;&apos;&apos; (bold). Thanks for setting me straight. ubiquity (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2019 (UTC)