User talk:Ubuntuuser13

WP:Neologism
Hello, Ubuntuuser13. I reverted you here, here, here, here and here per the WP:Neologism policy. Do read that policy. If you recreate articles for these terms, which are asexuality terms and can be covered at the Asexuality article if supported by WP:Reliable sources, I will take the articles to WP:AfD (a process to have the articles deleted). If there are WP:Reliable sources for these terms, they can be covered in an existing Wikipedia article. Do not create any more non-WP:Notable neologism articles. The Romantic orientation article is problematic and should be deleted because it mostly concerns asexuality, as seen by the sources used there, and it is therefore needless WP:Content forking. Also, some of its terms are currently unsourced and cannot be supported by any WP:Reliable sources. Flyer22 (talk) 07:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
—Josh3580talk/hist 07:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
—Josh3580talk/hist 08:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Aromanticism
Hello, Ubuntuuser13,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Aromanticism should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Aromanticism.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eddie891 Talk Work 13:56, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

"Queer platonic" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Queer platonic. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 17 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 14:10, 17 May 2021 (UTC)