User talk:Uchibbong

December 2020
Hello, I'm Chlod. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, History of Xinjiang, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Chlod (say hi!) 07:52, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

hi chlod, about the content of History of Xinjiang that your mensioned to me.. I’m new here- so i didn’t know that i had to change contents with proof of reliable source- so i’m sorry about that- ;)  i just added with my common knowledge that i learned from my life - anyways - can you please change or add more information that content of sentences : conquered by the Chinese Qing dynasty;

Qing dynasty is not original chinese that i know. Now china government is calling all china is one because in the future they don’t want to be same like soviet union divided piece by piece different countries - even china government did Xinhai Revolution because they wanted tor delete that qing dynasty cultures and history but ironically now they want to write the history by their own way “chinese qing dynasty” somehow.. some different way.. because they don’t want to be walk same way of soviet union- so they are now trying to brainwashing all people living in china. blah blah- for example UK conquered scotland but scotland people still know that they had their own cultures kept trying be find out their background and cultures and writings ... still resistance ...

anyways.. can not say it’s conquered by chinese qing dynasty.

anyways ..but that time was not -as you you know i don’t know how to add content with reliable resource here because i’m new here i just got interested to read asian history and found out that i just wanted to correct and add proper content- So you can find out reliable resources and you change it if you want people to know true detailed history.. everywhere history contents that Qing dynasty was not original han chinese race. mainland original han chinese people used to call them as savages or barbarians at that time- and original chinese han people thought they were different race same like Mongolians.. and they were trying to prevented and obstructed them not to growing bigger.. but manchu people (qing dynasty) later they got bigger and conquered original han people’s mainland china- so qing dynasty is same like genghis khan mongol yuan dynasty that they conquered china at that time, different race - So Can not write as chinese qing dynasty! even they had their own manchu language and writing, but their culture was soaked by han mainland chinese later and forgotten.. so they lost their own language and cultures cause they has less population than han people even they ruled the china at that time.. think about it- if you’re born in england, but later living in france for entire life.. or your children born in france .. is going to speak french fluently than their mother tongue.. blah blah.. anyways..

So If wikipedia just putting above content that “conquered by chinese qing dynasty” of sentence can be make wrong way of history or confuse people to learn the proper reliable true history. that’s what i thought - So please add or change if you agree above and after you search reliable source because you’re the expert! thanks :) Uchibbong (talk) 11:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)