User talk:Udoks

Welcome!
Hello, Udoks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 01:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, I'm VQuakr. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Air conditioning that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

In answer to this comment: So far you have succeeded only in consuming much more of the time, in combination, of other editors spent debating with you at Talk:Air conditioning about a totally absurd issue than the total of the time you have contributed (based on your edit history on this account) to anything that would improve Wikipedia. If you truly have any interest in the improvement of the encyclopedia, you will stop the drama, drop the stick and make some constructive, well-considered edits to other articles.  General Ization  Talk   03:46, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Breitbart News Network
Your recent editing history at Breitbart News Network shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- BullRangifer (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

There's a discussion about you on ANI!
Please note this complaint about you. Brustopher (talk) 09:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)