User talk:Ueosan 3326

April 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. luis  💬 17:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I think the original window looks good. It's good, simple and easy to understand.  Why design a new version?  If you don't agree you can create a vote on this wiki. Ueosan 3326 (talk) 17:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The new infobox (or window as you refer it as) has been in favor of members of WikiProject Weather as seen in this discussion, stating the flaws of the old infobox. luis  💬 17:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You also cannot revert it back just because you don't like it. luis  💬 17:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It's not that I don't like it. But to use a new style, I think it feels weird.  Storms from 1900 until now use their original form.  And the intensity color of the storm path doesn't match the SSHWS color at all, and pretty boy storms like Ilsa and Freddy suddenly use a new pattern. It's weird.  Anyway, I don't know for me, haha. Okay, so if the original format is flawed.  So let's fix every tropical cyclone that has its own wiki page to be the same.  No, there will only be tropical cyclones of 2023. Ueosan 3326 (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It's odd that only Tropical Cyclone 2023 uses windows like this. If they were all the same I wouldn't complain. Ueosan 3326 (talk) 18:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It must have been a lot of work for you to change every tropical cyclone wiki window to a new look. Hope you can do it, that's it, bye. Ueosan 3326 (talk) 18:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Cyclone Ilsa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.—Jasper Deng (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)