User talk:Uf.wiki.user12

Welcome!
Hello, Uf.wiki.user12, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft
Hi - I wasn't able to find your deleted content, but I do have some notes:


 * With book articles, make sure that you only give a general overview of the plot. So for example, you would summarize the plot and then give a couple of sentences to describe the author's letter at the end.


 * Since there are already articles on things like the meaning of the term dreamers, there's no need to define this term. It should be generally assumed that the reader will either click through to the main article if they have questions about the term or they will already be familiar with it. This also goes for information about the author - there's already an article for her, so we don't need to have a section about her. This should only cover these aspects as it pertains to the book. Also, if something is only tangentially related to the book (in that it's about the author, dreamers, or another topic and not the book per se) then it doesn't need to be covered in the book.


 * With literary references, only include these if this is discussed in independent, reliable sources that discuss the book. So for example, you would only include a reference if a source that discusses the book and explicitly states these references. I'm a little concerned that some of this was original research, as I can't see the sources. If it's not really mentioned in sourcing, then we can't really cover it in the article in any true depth.

I feel a little bad since I know that you lost the content, but I wanted to leave you these notes just in case. I also added an outline to your page, so that you at least have something to work from since you lost the material you'd added. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review
Leave feedback here. BookcaseXerox (talk) 20:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Overall the page on Dreamers is well written and neutral with some small changes that should be made to the page. In the lead you use the year 2018 twice I would recommend keeping the actual date and delete the previous 2018. Also for the second paragraph in the synopsis it would be better if some if not the entire section was moved to the background information section since it's technically isn't part of the actual story. All links are functional but you should also consider, I am not 100 percent certain, putting citations for the awards even if they are on the same page. Lastly the articles are relevant and sources are reliable. Omega789