User talk:Ufoldager

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mark von Rosing, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 16:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Some further notes on the article. I was going to propose removal due to notability issues but as you are the single contributor I thought I'll run it with you before. First, if this is an autobiography or there is a conflict of interest I suggest you stop now. The article will probably be deleted, but at least you wont waste more time. Assuming this is not the case, the article does not satisfy notability requirements in my opinion. I suggest you first start the article with a lead. Who is this person? What does he do? How is he notable? WP:BIO includes some guidelines on how to establish a person's notability.


 * Some other improvements. The article reads like a CV, not like an encyclopedic article. The education section will have to go. You can try using prose instead of as list, as part of the biography section. Also, most of the lists will be much better in prose. Business experience is something you put in a CV, not in an encyclopedia. There is much more to do before this is a proper article, but it's a start. By the way, if you are in anyway related to User:Dmbassa, see WP:SOCK. I hope this helps you. --Muhandes (talk) 17:07, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark von Rosing


A tag has been placed on Mark von Rosing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Cindamuse (talk) 04:07, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark von Rosing


A tag has been placed on Mark von Rosing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Muhandes (talk) 00:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)